Citation network
Mitchell Vs. Trawler Racer, Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 16, 1960
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Mitchell v. TrawlerSearch
-
Racer, Inc. - 362 U.S. 539 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court Mitchell v. TrawlerSearch
-
Racer, Inc., 362 U.S. 539 (1960) Mitchell v. TrawlerSearch
-
a question of maritime law upon which the Courts of Appeals have expressed differing views. Compare Cookingham v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 184 F.2d 213 (C.A. 3d Cir.), with Johnson Line v. MaloneySearch
-
F.2d 293 (C.A. 9th Cir.), and Poignant v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSearch
-
Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSearch
-
U. S. 613 , or as to the status of the vessel itself. Cf. West v. UnitedSearch
-
codes as establishing the limits of a shipowner's liability to a seaman injured in the service of his vessel. Harden v. GordonSearch
-
Page 362 U. S. 544 Reed v. CanfieldSearch
-
excuse their desertion or misconduct which otherwise would result in a forfeiture of their right to wages. See Dixon v. TheSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Rice v. TheSearch
-
of a shoreside employer to exercise ordinary care to provide his employees with a reasonably safe place to work. Brown v. TheSearch
-
Page 362 U. S. 545 Halverson v. NisenSearch
-
Tropical Fruit S.S. Co. v. TowleSearch
-
John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. EricksonSearch
-
Osceola opinion also finds arguable support in several subsequent decisions of this Court. Baltimore S.S. Co. v. PhillipsSearch
-
Plamals v. TheSearch
-
Pacific S.S. Co. v. PetersonSearch
-
as explicitly unrelated to the standard of ordinary care in a personal injury case appears in Carlisle Packing Co. v. SandangerSearch
-
F.2d at 711. In 1944, this Court decided Mahnich v. SouthernSearch
-
properly attributable to unseaworthiness. See 321 U.S. at 321 U. S. 105 -113. In Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSearch
-
absolute and completely independent of his duty under the Jones Act to exercise reasonable care. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSearch
-
Alaska Steamship Co. v. PettersonSearch
-
Rogers v. UnitedSearch
-
Boudoin v. LykesSearch
-
Crumady v. TheSearch
-
respect to an unseaworthy condition which may be only temporary. Of particular relevance here is Alaska Steamship Co. v. PettersonSearch
-
or withstand every imaginable peril of the sea, but a vessel reasonably suitable for her intended service. Boudoin v. LykesSearch
-
the vitality of a seaman's right to maintenance and cure has not diminished through the years. Calmar S.S. Corp. v. TaylorSearch
-
Waterman S.S. Corp. v. JonesSearch
-
Farrell v. UnitedSearch
-
Warren v. UnitedSearch
-
pp. 315-332. See also the illuminating discussion in the opinion of then Circuit Judge Harlan in Dixon v. UnitedSearch
-
recovery for injured seamen (the La Follette Act of 1915, 38 Stat. 1164, 1185) had been emasculated in Chelentis v. LuckenbachSearch
-
I.e., as simply overruling the decision in Plamals v. TheSearch
-
in a case very similar to this one has been recognized by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Poignant v. UnitedSearch
-
it occurred on May 29, 1922, in Carlisle Packing Co. v. SandangerSearch
-
to the distinctions urged by respondent, but regards the questions now presented as foreclosed by Alaska S.S. Co. v. PettersonSearch
-
was a snatch-block, standard ships' equipment, supplied pursuant to that permission. Following Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSearch
-
U. S. 85 , and Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSearch
-
way of limiting this extraordinary liability, and the significance of a carrier's liability, as such, shrank. See Pope v. NickersonSearch
-
compare In re Missouri S.S. Co., 42 Ch.D. 321 (1889), with Liverpool & G. W. Steam Co. v. PhenixSearch
-
that the carrier's ability to distribute the risk justified regarding him as an insurer, cf. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSearch
-
Lord Eldon, in Douglas v. ScougallSearch
-
arising and allowed to persist through the negligence of responsible servants. See, e.g., Baron Parke in Gibson v. SmallSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial