Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Florida

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 31, 1960

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 3 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. White Vs. Hart US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1871
  2. Gunn Vs. Barry US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1872
  3. Keith Vs. Clark US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  4. U.S. 121 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Florida
    Search
  5. U.S. 121 (1960) United States v. Florida
    Search
  6. This suit was first brought against Louisiana by the United States, United States v. Louisiana
    Search
  7. of the issues required that all those States be before the Court. United States v. Louisiana
    Search
  8. ownership Florida had claimed as its own so long, and which claim this Court had in effect rejected in United States v. Texas
    Search
  9. United States v. Louisiana
    Search
  10. and United States v. California
    Search
  11. And, as we have held, the 1953 Act was within the power of Page 363 U. S. 129 Congress to enact. Alabama v. Texas
    Search
  12. U. S. 272 . See also United States v. California
    Search
  13. This opinion applies also to United States v. Louisiana
    Search
  14. That would seem to be the effect of New Mexico v. Colorado
    Search
  15. U. S. 30 , and New Mexico v. Texas
    Search
  16. reconstruction cases, even though they related to different problems arising out of the Civil War. See Texas v. White
    Search
  17. not as an act to admit it to the Union. Cf. White v. Hart
    Search
  18. all appear to have figured in the debates. In these Page 363 U. S. 138 circumstances, the case of Virginia v. Tennessee
    Search
  19. pursuant to Congress' constitutional obligation to guarantee to each State a republican form of government. See Texas v. White
    Search
  20. be novel doctrine indeed, particularly where property rights of the United States are involved. Cf. United States v. California
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Florida
    Search
  22. the United States, United States v. Louisiana
    Search
  23. the Court. United States v. Louisiana
    Search
  24. United States v. Texas
    Search
  25. Alabama v. Texas
    Search
  26. United States v. California
    Search
  27. of New Mexico v. Colorado
    Search
  28. and New Mexico v. Texas
    Search
  29. of the Civil War. See Texas v. White
    Search
  30. the Union. Cf. White v. Hart
    Search
  31. of Virginia v. Tennessee
    Search
  32. See Texas v. White
    Search
  33. Cf. United States v. California
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial