Citation network
United States Vs. Brosnan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 13, 1960
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 237 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. BrosnanSearch
-
U.S. 237 (1960) United States v. BrosnanSearch
-
regardless of whether the federal statutory scheme specifically deals with them or not. See Clearfield Trust Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
to which a government tax lien attaches, we have looked to state law. United States v. BessSearch
-
United States v. GilbertSearch
-
state procedures governing their enforcement, or superimposing on them a new federal rule. Cf. Board of Comm'rs v. UnitedSearch
-
Minnesota v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. AlabamaSearch
-
or such other interest in the property as to render it an indispensable party under state law. See United States v. ClessSearch
-
or not the United States is an indispensable party to a judicial proceeding cannot depend on state law. See Minnesota v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Together with No. 183, Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SecuritySearch
-
United States v. CitySearch
-
United States v. LiverpoolSearch
-
United States v. WhiteSearch
-
the owner of real estate may clear his title to such real estate of the cloud of a Government mortgage or lien. Welch v. HamiltonSearch
-
S.D.Calif.), 33 F.(2d) 224, and U.S. v. TurnerSearch
-
Bracey v. GraySearch
-
Sohn v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Liss v. MedarySearch
-
State College Borough v. LeathersSearch
-
Moore v. SchellSearch
-
Commonwealth v. KeystoneSearch
-
exclude state procedures. But this is a commonplace in federal legislation, Hines v. DavidowitzSearch
-
U. S. 52 (1941), and is by no means the test. See Pennsylvania v. NelsonSearch
-
Clearfield Trust Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
The importance of uniformity in tax procedures is well illustrated Page 363 U. S. 261 in United States v. GilbertSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. BrosnanSearch
-
See Clearfield Trust Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Board of Comm'rs v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. ClessSearch
-
See Minnesota v. UnitedSearch
-
Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association v. UnitedSearch
-
Welch v. HamiltonSearch
-
and U.S. v. TurnerSearch
-
Commonwealth v. KeystoneSearch
-
See Pennsylvania v. NelsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial