Citation network
Wolfe Vs. North Carolina
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 1960
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Wolfe v. NorthSearch
-
Carolina - 364 U.S. 177 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court Wolfe v. NorthSearch
-
Carolina, 364 U.S. 177 (1960) Wolfe v. NorthSearch
-
from operating the golf course on a racially discriminatory basis. The federal court granted the injunction. Simkins v. CitySearch
-
Its judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on June 28, 1957. City of Greensboro v. SimkinsSearch
-
under which the appellants had been tried, and arrested Page 364 U. S. 181 the judgments against them. State v. CookeSearch
-
could not deny the use of the property to citizens simply because they were Negroes. . . . Since the decision in Brown v. BoardSearch
-
North Carolina Court to hold that the findings of fact and judgment of the federal court in the civil case of Simkins v. CitySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
nonfederal grounds of decision which are without any fair or substantial support. Page 364 U. S. 186 NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
Staub v. CitySearch
-
Ward v. LoveSearch
-
Williams v. GeorgiaSearch
-
State v. RobinsonSearch
-
State v. WolfeSearch
-
State v. GauseSearch
-
State v. StiwinterSearch
-
State v. DeeSearch
-
State v. WeaverSearch
-
State v. DavisSearch
-
State v. FranklinSearch
-
N.C. at 649-650, 50 S.E.2d at 741-742. In State v. WolfeSearch
-
he transcript is not now Page 364 U. S. 191 subject to change or correction. State v. MooreSearch
-
N.C. at 512, 199 S.E. at 732. It is thus apparent that the present case is not of a pattern with Williams v. GeorgiaSearch
-
determination operating discriminatorily against these particular litigants. At least since the decision in State v. TurnerSearch
-
See State v. BrewerSearch
-
State v. CochranSearch
-
State v. AndrewsSearch
-
State v. McKinnonSearch
-
State v. ChapmanSearch
-
State v. JohnsonSearch
-
N.C. 252, 17 S.E.2d 7. See also State v. WagstaffSearch
-
State v. BrownSearch
-
State v. CaperSearch
-
State v. GastonSearch
-
State v. FosterSearch
-
State v. McKnightSearch
-
State v. ShemwellSearch
-
Federal rights are in controversy than when the case turns entirely upon questions of local or general law. Callan v. BransfordSearch
-
Brown v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McDonaldSearch
-
their race. The trial judge so instructed the jury, and the Supreme Court of North Carolina so held. Cf. Constantian v. AnsonSearch
-
no view as to the merits of this constitutional claim, we note only that it is a completely novel one. Cf. Hoag v. NewSearch
-
When the doctrine of collateral estoppel should be applied is not always easily solved. In Van Schuyver v. StateSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial