Citation network
Uphaus Vs. Wyman
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 14, 1960
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 388 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court Uphaus v. WymanSearch
-
U.S. 388 (1960) Uphaus v. WymanSearch
-
N.H. 461, 159 A.2d 160. PER CURIAM. In view of the Court's decision in Uphaus v. WymanSearch
-
Wyman v. UphausSearch
-
no longer wanted him to produce the list of names. In consequence, while I remain of the view that the Court in Uphaus v. WymanSearch
-
dissent of MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and agree with him that, since the New Hampshire law upheld by this Court in Uphaus v. WymanSearch
-
direct abridgments of First Amendment freedoms, has been fully expressed in previous cases. See, e.g., Barenblatt v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 360 U. S. 109 , 360 U. S. 141 -146 (dissenting opinion), Beauharnais v. IllinoisSearch
-
Thus, the case falls squarely within the holding of this Court in United States v. LovettSearch
-
Beauharnais v. IllinoisSearch
-
American Communications Ass'n v. DoudsSearch
-
Harrison v. EvansSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
disclosure. On June 8, 1959, we affirmed his conviction in the state courts of New Hampshire by a divided vote. Uphaus v. WymanSearch
-
were demanded. In such a case, the defendant carries the keys to freedom in his own pocket, as pointed out in Uphaus v. WymanSearch
-
requirement to produce assumes that their production is relevant to some interest of the State. As stated in Uphaus v. WymanSearch
-
have no apparent pertinency when an issue of civil contempt is tendered. Are the principles announced in Uphaus v. WymanSearch
-
of the legislature, Uphaus v. WymanSearch
-
abridge the rights of members to engage in lawful association in support of their common beliefs. We said in NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
forms of governmental action which might interfere with freedom as assembly, it said in American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSearch
-
us that World Fellowship, Inc., was at any time engaged in any conduct that could be called unlawful. We had NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
as individual who possessed membership lists challenged the right of government to demand their production. In Bates v. LittleSearch
-
to bear only after the exercise of governmental power had threatened to force disclosure of the members' names. NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
association as the members of the other. These rights extend even to Communists, as a unanimous Court held in De Jonge v. OregonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Uphaus v. WymanSearch
-
Barenblatt v. UnitedSearch
-
Beauharnais v. IllinoisSearch
-
NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
In Bates v. LittleSearch
-
De Jonge v. OregonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial