Citation network
Mcphaul Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 14, 1960
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
McPhaul v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 364 U.S. 372 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court McPhaul v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 364 U.S. 372 (1960) McPhaul v. UnitedSearch
-
or is impeding justice by not explaining what happened to them, United States v. GoldsteinSearch
-
notwithstanding he has never claimed he could not produce them. We think the Court's decision in United States v. BryanSearch
-
the objection or remedy it is in itself a contempt of its authority and an obstruction of its processes. See Bevan v. KriegerSearch
-
them. The burden then shifted to the petitioner to present some evidence to explain or justify his refusal. Morrison v. CaliforniaSearch
-
even though production of the papers might tend to incriminate (their keeper) personally.' United States v. WhiteSearch
-
Rogers v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 340 U. S. 367 , 340 U. S. 372 . And see Curcio v. UnitedSearch
-
questions respecting the records, and thus risking waiver of his privilege against self-incrimination. See Curcio v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, 354 U. S. 118 . Nor does the rule of Blau v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 340 U. S. 159 , excuse one subpoenaed to produce records in a representative capacity, United States v. WhiteSearch
-
petitioner made no objection to the subpoena before the Subcommittee on the ground of pertinency, see Barenblatt v. UnitedSearch
-
Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 383 not more sweeping than those sustained against challenges of undue breadth in Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSearch
-
U. S. 501 , and Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSearch
-
See also the companion case of United States v. FleischmanSearch
-
that connects the defendant either with the organization or with the documents. Reliance is placed on United States v. BryanSearch
-
before the Committee, because no quorum of the Committee was present when the witness made default. In United States v. FleischmanSearch
-
As respects the shift of the burden of going forward in a criminal prosecution to the defendant ( Morrison v. CaliforniaSearch
-
may be sufficient under the cases where it has first been shown that he has a connection with them. See United States v. FleischmanSearch
-
Nilva v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court McPhaul v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. GoldsteinSearch
-
See Bevan v. KriegerSearch
-
Morrison v. CaliforniaSearch
-
United States v. WhiteSearch
-
Curcio v. UnitedSearch
-
See Curcio v. UnitedSearch
-
of Blau v. UnitedSearch
-
Barenblatt v. UnitedSearch
-
and Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSearch
-
of United States v. FleischmanSearch
-
In United States v. FleischmanSearch
-
See United States v. FleischmanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial