Citation network
Polites Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 21, 1960
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Polites v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 364 U.S. 426 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court Polites v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 364 U.S. 426 (1960) Polites v. UnitedSearch
-
Procedure to vacate the judgment, on the ground that it was voidable under this Court's subsequent decisions in Nowak v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 356 U. S. 660 , and Maisenberg v. UnitedSearch
-
pending in that court appeals from three other denaturalization judgments by the same District Court. United States v. SweetSearch
-
United States v. ChomiakSearch
-
and United States v. CharnowolaSearch
-
of counsel, was that, in the light of this Court's opinions in two cases which had recently been decided, Nowak v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and that, in any event, the doctrine of Ackermann v. UnitedSearch
-
instant case is squarely controlled by the decision of this Court in Ackermann v. UnitedSearch
-
Keilbar was reversed upon a stipulation by the Government that the evidence was insufficient to support it. Keilbar v. UnitedSearch
-
not in fact work the controlling change in the governing law which he asserted. The decisions in question are Nowak v. UnitedSearch
-
to constitutional principles, by the clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence which is required. Cf. Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
in every meaningful sense was abundantly shown. Cf. Galvan v. PressSearch
-
strict compliance with the conditions imposed by Congress as prerequisites to acquisition of citizenship. See Maney v. UnitedSearch
-
Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
Maryland v. BaltimoreSearch
-
did the petitioner allege the existence of any new or mitigating evidence upon these factual issues. Cf. Klapprott v. UnitedSearch
-
judgment of denaturalization should have prospective application. The Court's opinion, although it refers to Ackermann v. UnitedSearch
-
was grounds for modification or dissolution of that decree insofar as it might affect future conduct. Pennsylvania v. WheelingSearch
-
Ladner v. SiegelSearch
-
of Civil Procedure) continue this history of equitable adjustment to changing conditions of fact and law. McGrath v. PotashSearch
-
requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. Pending appeal by the Government, this Court held, in Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSearch
-
effect. The cases under Rule 60(b)(5) relied on by the United States are readily distinguishable. In Title v. UnitedSearch
-
Elgin Nat'l Watch Co. v. BarrettSearch
-
F.2d 776, and Berryhill v. UnitedSearch
-
F.2d 217, it was entirely possible that the remedy by appeal would have been successfully invoked. And in Collins v. CitySearch
-
of the judgment would have retroactively disturbed existing rights and financial reliance on the judgment. In Scotten v. LittlefieldSearch
-
United States v. SwiftSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Polites v. UnitedSearch
-
Nowak v. UnitedSearch
-
and Maisenberg v. UnitedSearch
-
District Court. United States v. SweetSearch
-
of Ackermann v. UnitedSearch
-
Ackermann v. UnitedSearch
-
Keilbar v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Galvan v. PressSearch
-
See Maney v. UnitedSearch
-
Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
Maryland v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Cf. Klapprott v. UnitedSearch
-
Pennsylvania v. WheelingSearch
-
McGrath v. PotashSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial