Citation network
Reina Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 19, 1960
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Reina v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 364 U.S. 507 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court Reina v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 364 U.S. 507 (1960) Reina v. UnitedSearch
-
immunity because, Page 364 U. S. 510 assuming only federal immunity is granted, they held that United States v. MurdockSearch
-
U.S. at 347 U. S. 181 . In Ullmann v. UnitedSearch
-
and in Adams v. MarylandSearch
-
He insists, however, that the congressional authority to enact narcotics laws -- rested on the Commerce Clause, Brolan v. UnitedSearch
-
Yee Hem v. UnitedSearch
-
or the taxing power, United States v. DoremusSearch
-
Alston v. UnitedSearch
-
Nigro v. UnitedSearch
-
But the petitioner misconceives the reach of the principle applied in Ullmann and Adams v. MarylandSearch
-
and distinctions based upon the particular granted power concerned have no support in the Constitution. See Brown v. WalkerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States have traditionally regulated the traffic in narcotics, although that fact has troubled one court. See Tedesco v. UnitedSearch
-
There is indeed weighty authority for that proposition. United States v. RomeroSearch
-
Brown v. WalkerSearch
-
quo for further exposing himself to personal disgrace or opprobrium. That reason would not be tenable under Brown v. WalkerSearch
-
testify, the statute grants him immunity fully coextensive with the constitutional privilege. Some language in Brown v. WalkerSearch
-
United States v. ReinaSearch
-
to bring into issue any ground upon which the length of the sentence may open the decision to attack. Cf. Boynton v. VirginiaSearch
-
the District Court's power in the summary proceedings it conducted in this case. In my dissenting opinion in Green v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Reina v. UnitedSearch
-
In Ullmann v. UnitedSearch
-
Adams v. MarylandSearch
-
the Commerce Clause, Brolan v. UnitedSearch
-
Ullmann and Adams v. MarylandSearch
-
the Constitution. See Brown v. WalkerSearch
-
See Tedesco v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. RomeroSearch
-
Brown v. WalkerSearch
-
Cf. Boynton v. VirginiaSearch
-
Green v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MurdockSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial