Citation network
Teamsters Union Vs. Oliver
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 19, 1959
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 283 (1959) U.S. Supreme Court Teamsters Union v. OliverSearch
-
Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, AFL-CIO v. OliverSearch
-
reduced by the excess of his operating expenses over the rental he received. The Court of Common Pleas held in Oliver v. All-StatesSearch
-
Milk Wagon Drivers' Union v. LakeSearch
-
curtailment of jobs through withdrawal of more and more carrier-owned vehicles from service. Cf. Bakery Drivers Local v. WohlSearch
-
limits to the subject matter properly included within the scope of mandatory collective bargaining, cf. Labor Board v. Borg-WarnerSearch
-
their own charter for the ordering of industrial relations, and thereby to minimize industrial strife. See Labor Board v. JonesSearch
-
Labor Board v. AmericanSearch
-
Congress was not concerned with the substantive terms upon which the parties agreed. Cf. Terminal Railroad Ass'n v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
a system of federal law applicable to the agreement the parties made in response to that duty, Textile Workers Union v. LincolnSearch
-
some outside limits (not contended to be exceeded here) on what their agreement may provide, see Allen Bradley Co. v. LocalSearch
-
United States v. EmployingSearch
-
the solutions that the parties' agreement can provide to the problems of wages and working conditions. Cf. California v. TaylorSearch
-
leave the parties free, the inconsistent application of state law is necessarily outside the power of the State. Hill v. FloridaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 538 , 325 U. S. 542 -544. Cf. International Union v. O'BrienSearch
-
Amalgamated Ass'n v. WisconsinSearch
-
Plankinton Packing Co. v. WisconsinSearch
-
a sort which Congress has indicated may be left to prohibition by the several States. Cf. Algoma Plywood & Veneer Co. v. WisconsinSearch
-
law empowers the parties to make, rather than in terms in an enactment of Congress. See Railway Employes' Dept. v. HansonSearch
-
Weber v. Anheuser-BuschSearch
-
Page 358 U. S. 298 was not an employee of those carriers, but was an independent contractor, United States v. SilkSearch
-
carriers and the lessors of motor vehicle equipment, see the discussion in American Trucking Ass'ns Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Teamsters Union v. OliverSearch
-
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, AFL-CIO v. OliverSearch
-
Oliver v. All-StatesSearch
-
Cf. Bakery Drivers Local v. WohlSearch
-
Labor Board v. Borg-WarnerSearch
-
See Labor Board v. JonesSearch
-
Cf. Terminal Railroad Ass'n v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
Textile Workers Union v. LincolnSearch
-
Allen Bradley Co. v. LocalSearch
-
United States v. EmployingSearch
-
Cf. California v. TaylorSearch
-
of the State. Hill v. FloridaSearch
-
Cf. International Union v. O'BrienSearch
-
States. Cf. Algoma Plywood & Veneer Co. v. WisconsinSearch
-
of Congress. See Railway Employes' Dept. v. HansonSearch
-
American Trucking Ass'ns Inc. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial