Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

HeflIn Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 24, 1959

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 3 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Hayman US Supreme Court · Jan 07, 1952
  2. Riddle Vs. Dyche US Supreme Court · May 21, 1923
  3. United States Vs. Mayer US Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1914
  4. Heflin v. United
    Search
  5. States - 358 U.S. 415 (1959) U.S. Supreme Court Heflin v. United
    Search
  6. States, 358 U.S. 415 (1959) Heflin v. United
    Search
  7. for one who robs a bank, but only to provide punishment for those who receive the loot from the robber. Prince v. United
    Search
  8. on expiration of the sentence on the conspiracy count. All these events took place before our decision in Prince v. United
    Search
  9. may not be had. We reviewed in United States v. Hayman
    Search
  10. no more than habeas corpus ( McNally v. Hill
    Search
  11. Page 358 U. S. 419 II. We held in Prince v. United
    Search
  12. This was a corrected sentence imposed after the appeal, as reported in Heflin v. United
    Search
  13. United States v. Bradford
    Search
  14. United States v. McGann
    Search
  15. Bogish v. Tees
    Search
  16. Fooshee v. United
    Search
  17. Duggins v. United
    Search
  18. Crow v. United
    Search
  19. Oughton v. United
    Search
  20. Hoffman v. United
    Search
  21. Miller v. United
    Search
  22. like a petition for a writ of habeas corpus ( Riddle v. Dyche
    Search
  23. is reviewed at length in the opinion which Mr. Chief Justice Vinson wrote for the Court in United States v. Hayman
    Search
  24. of one in custody. It is unnecessary to paraphrase here Mr. Justice Stone's penetrating discussion in McNally v. Hill
    Search
  25. and many of them have given careful consideration to this very issue. United States v. Bradford
    Search
  26. Juelich v. United
    Search
  27. Williams v. United
    Search
  28. Toliver v. United
    Search
  29. Smith v. United
    Search
  30. It was a codification of existing law, and was intended to remove any doubt created by the decision in United States v. Mayer
    Search
  31. and Rule 35 in Duggins v. United
    Search
  32. U.S. Supreme Court Heflin v. United
    Search
  33. Prince v. United
    Search
  34. McNally v. Hill
    Search
  35. Bogish v. Tees
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial