Citation network
irvIn Vs. Dowd
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 04, 1959
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 394 (1959) U.S. Supreme Court Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
U.S. 394 (1959) Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
the highest court of a State, even though, as here, that court could have based its decision on another ground. Brown v. AllenSearch
-
opinions of the Indiana Supreme Court and the District Court held the constitutional claim to be without merit. Irvin v. StateSearch
-
Selke v. StateSearch
-
which was enacted by Congress to codify the existing habeas corpus practice. See Darr v. BurfordSearch
-
Brown v. AllenSearch
-
of his constitutional claim from the Indiana Supreme Court. Certainly Brown v. AllenSearch
-
S. 406 upon by the Court of Appeals, does not bear on his situation. In that case, the two petitioners in Daniels v. AllenSearch
-
the highest court of the State, even though, as here, that court could have based its decision on another ground. Wade v. MayoSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of the Court, with the understanding that the Court does not here depart from the principles announced in Brown v. AllenSearch
-
Irvin's petition seeking direct review on certiorari to the Indiana Supreme Court from that court's decision in Irvin v. StateSearch
-
the other is Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
court removed all doubt that state law supported its decision, and there was an end of the matter. Compare Whitney v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 357 , and Herb v. PitcairnSearch
-
U. S. 117 , 325 U. S. 325 U.S. 77, with State Tax Commission of Utah v. VanSearch
-
Cott, 306 U. S. 511 , and Van Cott v. StateSearch
-
Minnesota v. NationalSearch
-
Tea Co., 309 U. S. 551 , and National Tea Co. v. StateSearch
-
Williams v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U. S. 375 , and Williams v. StateSearch
-
Irvin v. StateSearch
-
by Mr. Chief Justice Fuller, for the Court, of this jurisdictional sine qua non in California Powder Works Co. v. DavisSearch
-
petitioner's failure to comply with the State's procedural rules required affirmance of his conviction. Cf. Patterson v. AlabamaSearch
-
Page 359 U. S. 418 Williams v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
See Darr v. BurfordSearch
-
the Indiana Supreme Court. Certainly Brown v. AllenSearch
-
Daniels v. AllenSearch
-
Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
Compare Whitney v. CaliforniaSearch
-
and Herb v. PitcairnSearch
-
State Tax Commission of Utah v. VanSearch
-
and Van Cott v. StateSearch
-
and National Tea Co. v. StateSearch
-
and Williams v. StateSearch
-
California Powder Works Co. v. DavisSearch
-
Cf. Patterson v. AlabamaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial