Citation network
Bibb Vs. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 25, 1959
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Bibb v. NavajoSearch
-
Freight Lines, Inc. - 359 U.S. 520 (1959) U.S. Supreme Court Bibb v. NavajoSearch
-
Freight Lines, Inc., 359 U.S. 520 (1959) Bibb v. NavajoSearch
-
commerce, despite the fact that they may have an impact on interstate commerce. South Carolina Highway Dept. v. BarnwellSearch
-
Southern Pacific Co. v. ArizonaSearch
-
safety are not the end of our problem. Local regulation of the weight of trucks using the highways upheld in Sproles v. BinfordSearch
-
carriers. State control of the width and weight of motor trucks and trailers sustained in South Carolina Highway Dept. v. BarnwellSearch
-
price to exact from interstate and intrastate motor carriers alike. And the same conclusion was reached in Maurer v. HamiltonSearch
-
to differently designed vehicles once another state line was reached. We had a related problem in Southern Pacific Co. v. ArizonaSearch
-
prescribing a maximum length of 70 cars for freight trains moving through that State. More closely in point is Morgan v. VirginiaSearch
-
the extent of the burden it imposes on interstate commerce. They rely in the main on South Carolina Highway Dept. v. BarnwellSearch
-
supra. There is language in that opinion which, read in isolation from such later decisions as Southern Pacific Co. v. ArizonaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
supra, and Morgan v. VirginiaSearch
-
same presumption of validity when challenged under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Lincoln Union v. NorthwesternSearch
-
Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
the Supremacy Clause into play. Like any local law that conflicts with federal regulatory measures ( California Comm'n v. UnitedSearch
-
Service Storage & Transfer Co. v. VirginiaSearch
-
to use the words of Chief Justice Hughes in Sproles v. BinfordSearch
-
but their validity or the validity of the statute in light of them is not questioned here. But see Rudolph Express Co. v. BibbSearch
-
commerce. Nor is it contended that the statute violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Cf. People v. WarrenSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Bibb v. NavajoSearch
-
South Carolina Highway Dept. v. BarnwellSearch
-
Morgan v. VirginiaSearch
-
and Morgan v. VirginiaSearch
-
the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Lincoln Union v. NorthwesternSearch
-
California Comm'n v. UnitedSearch
-
Rudolph Express Co. v. BibbSearch
-
the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Cf. People v. WarrenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial