Citation network
Napue Vs. Illinois
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 1959
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 264 (1959) U.S. Supreme Court Napue v. IllinoisSearch
-
U.S. 264 (1959) Napue v. IllinoisSearch
-
of false evidence, known to be such by representatives of the State, must fall under the Fourteenth Amendment, Mooney v. HolohanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Curran v. DelawareSearch
-
F.2d 707. See New York ex rel. Whitman v. WilsonSearch
-
U. S. 688 , and White v. RagenSearch
-
U. S. 760 . Compare Jones v. KentuckySearch
-
F.2d 335, 338, with In re Sawyer's Petition, 229 F.2d 805, 809. Cf. Mesarosh v. UnitedSearch
-
obtains when the State, although not soliciting false evidence, allows it to go uncorrected when it appears. Alcorta v. TexasSearch
-
Thompson v. DyeSearch
-
Almeida v. BaldiSearch
-
Montgomery v. RagenSearch
-
s life or liberty may depend. As stated by the New York Court of Appeals in a case very similar to this one, People v. SavvidesSearch
-
testimony could not in any reasonable likelihood have affected the judgment of the jury. The State relies on Hysler v. FloridaSearch
-
is clear, resting, as it does, on our solemn responsibility for maintaining the Constitution inviolate. Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
U. S. 1 . Page 360 U. S. 272 This principle was well stated in Niemotko v. MarylandSearch
-
It is now so well settled that the Court was able to speak in Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. ScurlockSearch
-
Payne v. ArkansasSearch
-
Feiner v. NewSearch
-
Malinski v. NewSearch
-
Smith v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 412 , 289 U. S. 420 . See also, e.g., Roth v. UnitedSearch
-
Creswill v. GrandSearch
-
U. S. 261 . Mr. Justice Holmes, writing for the Court, recognized the principle over 35 years ago in Davis v. WechslerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Napue v. IllinoisSearch
-
the Fourteenth Amendment, Mooney v. HolohanSearch
-
Whitman v. WilsonSearch
-
and White v. RagenSearch
-
Compare Jones v. KentuckySearch
-
Cf. Mesarosh v. UnitedSearch
-
Alcorta v. TexasSearch
-
Thompson v. DyeSearch
-
Almeida v. BaldiSearch
-
Montgomery v. RagenSearch
-
People v. SavvidesSearch
-
Hysler v. FloridaSearch
-
Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
Niemotko v. MarylandSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial