Citation network
Burns Vs. Ohio
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 1959
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 252 (1959) U.S. Supreme Court Burns v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. 252 (1959) Burns v. OhioSearch
-
this indigent petitioner solely because he was unable to pay the filing fee violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
is a pauper, it presses several arguments which it claims distinguish Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
Despite the passage of years, the appeal was timely. State v. GrisafulliSearch
-
Wanamaker v. MillerSearch
-
Shortly after this Court's decision in Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
Republic Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSearch
-
by what a state court may deem to be a case or judgment in the exercise of the state court's jurisdiction. See Tyler v. JudgesSearch
-
Doremus v. BoardSearch
-
Litigants cannot give this Court power which the Constitution and Congress have withheld. Mansfield, C. & L.M. R. Co. v. SwanSearch
-
of Ohio was not asked to consider the appeal, nor did it itself refuse to do so. The decisions in State ex rel. Dawson v. RobertsSearch
-
Ohio St. 341, 135 N.E.2d 409, and State ex rel. Wanamaker v. MillerSearch
-
Ohio St. 174 and 176, 128 N.E.2d 108 and 110, mandamus denied sub nom. Wanamaker v. SupremeSearch
-
of courts. It is an assumption one can confidently make based upon the records in this Court. See Wanamaker v. SupremeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Court of Ohio might well yield to this claim of Burns as other courts in like situations have yielded since Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
rights determined and, incidentally, secure heavy damages for any denial of constitutional rights. See Lane v. WilsonSearch
-
Amendment. That lays the foundation for a habeas corpus proceeding in the United States District Court. See Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
court costs. The contingent nature of the release would not impair the availability of habeas corpus. See Chin Yow v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Burns v. OhioSearch
-
the Fourteenth Amendment. Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
State v. GrisafulliSearch
-
Wanamaker v. MillerSearch
-
See Tyler v. JudgesSearch
-
Mansfield, C. & L.M. R. Co. v. SwanSearch
-
Dawson v. RobertsSearch
-
Wanamaker v. SupremeSearch
-
Court. See Wanamaker v. SupremeSearch
-
See Lane v. WilsonSearch
-
the United States District Court. See Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
See Chin Yow v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial