Citation network
Staub Vs. City of Baxley
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 13, 1958
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Staub v. CitySearch
-
of Baxley - 355 U.S. 313 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court Staub v. CitySearch
-
of Baxley, 355 U.S. 313 (1958) Staub v. CitySearch
-
U. S. 341 , 269 U. S. 346 , and cases cited. See also Schuylkill Trust Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
and Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
U. S. 444 , 303 U. S. 450 . As Mr. Justice Holmes said in Davis v. WechslerSearch
-
grounds, plainly untenable, may be thus put forward successfully, our power to review easily may be avoided. Ward v. LoveSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the Constitution does not preclude review in this Court of a judgment of conviction under such an ordinance. Smith v. CahoonSearch
-
Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
Ward v. LoveSearch
-
Flynn v. StateSearch
-
In enunciating that rule, the court was following a long line of its own decisions. Atlantic Loan Co. v. PetersonSearch
-
Miller v. HeadSearch
-
Stegall v. SouthwestSearch
-
Krasner v. RutledgeSearch
-
from invasion by state action, and municipal ordinances adopted under state authority constitute state action. Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
controlling guides governing the action of the Mayor and Council in granting or withholding a permit. Cf. Niemotko v. MarylandSearch
-
official -- is an unconstitutional censorship or prior restraint upon the enjoyment of those freedoms. In Cantwell v. ConnecticutSearch
-
U.S. at 310 U. S. 305 , 310 U. S. 307 . To the same effect are Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
Hague v. CIOSearch
-
Schneider v. PageSearch
-
Kunz v. NewSearch
-
Section v. TheSearch
-
Staub v. MayorSearch
-
confronted with any question concerning the right of the city to regulate the pursuit of an occupation. Cf. Thomas v. CollinsSearch
-
governing the discretion of the park commissioner in granting or refusing such permits and referring to Hague v. CIOSearch
-
Lovell v. GriffinSearch
-
ordinance, and not against the ordinance as a whole. On this doctrine of Georgia appellate procedure, it cited Anthony v. CitySearch
-
of Atlanta, 66 Ga.App. 504, 505, 18 S.E.2d 81-82, which, in turn, cited Glover v. CitySearch
-
Act has served as one of the most nationalizing forces in our history. By that section, as construed in Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, strongly reinforced by Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
is, of course, for this Court to pass on the substantive sufficiency of a claim of federal right, First National Bank v. AndersonSearch
-
and appellate, that govern adjudication of all constitutional issues in that State. Edelman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Parker v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 571 . In Nickel v. ColeSearch
-
as circumstances will permit. See the classic statement of the unanimous Court in Liverpool, N.Y. & P.S.S. Co. v. CommissionersSearch
-
by Mr. Justice Brandeis, in his well known concurring opinion, frequently cited and always approvingly, in Ashwander v. TennesseeSearch
-
limited aspects of a statute that alone may affect the rights of a particular litigant before the Court. See Muskrat v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 447 . A statute may be found invalid in some of its parts but valid in others, see Dorchy v. KansasSearch
-
U. S. 286 , 264 U. S. 289 -290, it may be valid at one time and not another, see Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSearch
-
U. S. 547 -548, it may be valid under one state of facts, but not another, see Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. AndersonSearch
-
U. S. 329 -330, it may be valid as to one class of persons and invalid as to others, see New York ex rel. Hatch v. ReardonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial