Citation network
Trop Vs. Dulles
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 31, 1958
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 86 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court Trop v. DullesSearch
-
U.S. 86 (1958) Trop v. DullesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
military authorities. Pp. 356 U. S. 104 -105. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, while agreeing with the Court, in Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
citizenship and become stateless by reason of his conviction by court-martial for wartime desertion. As in Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
problems. We conclude that the judgment in this case must be reversed for the following reasons. I In Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
alone, the judgment in this case should be reversed. II Since a majority of the Court concluded in Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
This Court has been called upon to decide whether or not various statutes were penal ever since 1798. Calder v. BullSearch
-
but as an implementation of the sovereign power to exclude, from which the deporting power is derived. Mahler v. EbySearch
-
it did not hesitate to declare that the penalty was cruel in its excessiveness and unusual in its character. Weems v. UnitedSearch
-
E.g., United States v. LovettSearch
-
E.g., Mahler v. EbySearch
-
Hawker v. NewSearch
-
Cf. Davis v. BeasonSearch
-
Fong Yue Ting v. UnitedSearch
-
Baumgartner v. UnitedSearch
-
Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
Francis v. ResweberSearch
-
Weems v. UnitedSearch
-
meaning of the phrase, precise distinctions between cruelty and unusualness do not seem to have been drawn. See Weems v. UnitedSearch
-
Milwaukee Social Democratic Publishing Co. v. BurlesonSearch
-
See discussion in Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
rigors of statelessness assumes too much. Undermining such assumption is the still fresh memory of Shaughnessy v. UnitedSearch
-
for such military control over the right to be an American citizen. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, concurring. In Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
Here, as in Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
might rationally appear lacking, I cannot say that this means lies beyond Congress' power to choose. Cf. Korematsu v. UnitedSearch
-
This was emphasized in the leading case under the 1865 Act, Huber v. ReilySearch
-
followed only upon conviction by court-martial. This view of the 1865 Act was approved by this Court in Kurtz v. MottSearch
-
See McCafferty v. GuyerSearch
-
State v. SymondsSearch
-
Gotcheus v. MathesonSearch
-
M'Culloch v. MarylandSearch
-
The opinion in Huber v. ReilySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Trop v. DullesSearch
-
I In Perez v. BrownellSearch
-
Toth v. QuarlesSearch
-
Baumgartner v. UnitedSearch
-
Francis v. ResweberSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial