Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Payne Vs. Arkansas

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 19, 1958

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 8 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Watts Vs. Indiana US Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1949
  2. Chambers Vs. Florida US Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1940
  3. Lisenba Vs. California US Supreme Court · Dec 08, 1941
  4. Haley Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1948
  5. Stroble Vs. California US Supreme Court · Apr 07, 1952
  6. Leyra Vs. Denno US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1954
  7. Fikes Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1957
  8. Lyons Vs. Oklahoma US Supreme Court · Jun 05, 1944
  9. U.S. 560 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court Payne v. Arkansas
    Search
  10. U.S. 560 (1958) Payne v. Arkansas
    Search
  11. because it violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Pp. 356 U. S. 567 -568. (c) Stein v. New
    Search
  12. because obtained by coercion culminating in a threat of mob violence. Following Arkansas procedure ( McClellan v. State
    Search
  13. The admitted facts, set out above, make applicable the conclusion reached in Chambers v. Florida
    Search
  14. Brown v. Mississippi
    Search
  15. Malinski v. New
    Search
  16. Ashcraft v. Tennessee
    Search
  17. and Leyra v. Denno
    Search
  18. supra, at 314 U. S. 237 -238. See also Brown v. Mississippi
    Search
  19. The cases of Chambers v. Florida
    Search
  20. and Ward v. Texas
    Search
  21. See Fikes v. Alabama
    Search
  22. supra, at 322 U. S. 597 . Stein v. New
    Search
  23. s confession was voluntary. Therefore, he would affirm the judgment rendered. See his dissent in Moore v. Michigan
    Search
  24. be deemed coerced, there is sufficient other evidence of guilt to sustain the conviction on the authority of Stein v. New
    Search
  25. procedure on admission of challenged confessions is identical to that which we approved in that case. See Nolan v. State
    Search
  26. Dinwiddie v. State
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Payne v. Arkansas
    Search
  28. Stein v. New
    Search
  29. McClellan v. State
    Search
  30. Brown v. Mississippi
    Search
  31. of Chambers v. Florida
    Search
  32. Moore v. Michigan
    Search
  33. of Stein v. New
    Search
  34. See Nolan v. State
    Search
  35. Ashcraft v. Tennessee
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales