Citation network
Hoag Vs. New Jersey
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 19, 1958
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Hoag v. NewSearch
-
Jersey - 356 U.S. 464 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court Hoag v. NewSearch
-
Jersey, 356 U.S. 464 (1958) Hoag v. NewSearch
-
that these safeguards, as such, are carried over under the Fourteenth Amendment as restrictions on the States. Palko v. ConnecticutSearch
-
State v. LabatoSearch
-
the States should have the widest latitude in the administration of their own systems of criminal justice. See Hurtado v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Twining v. NewSearch
-
Brock v. NorthSearch
-
offenses, we reach the conclusion that the petitioner in this case was not deprived of due process. In Brock v. NorthSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
widely employed in criminal cases in both Page 356 U. S. 471 state and federal courts. See, e.g., Harris v. StateSearch
-
Commonwealth v. EvansSearch
-
Sealfon v. UnitedSearch
-
Yates v. UnitedSearch
-
A.2d at 632. Possessing no such corrective power over state courts as we do over the federal courts, see Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
examine the record in a state criminal trial, and is not foreclosed by the conclusion of the state court. Niemotko v. MarylandSearch
-
Feiner v. NewSearch
-
to determine with certainty which issues were decided by the former general verdict of acquittal. See, e.g., People v. RogersSearch
-
State v. ErwinSearch
-
United States v. HalbrookSearch
-
F.Supp. 345. Keeping in mind the fact that jury verdicts are sometimes inconsistent or irrational, see, e.g., Dunn v. UnitedSearch
-
Green v. UnitedSearch
-
of these undisputed facts, the task of making that evaluation is inescapably the function of this Court. Niemotko v. MarylandSearch
-
Fay v. NewSearch
-
of a particular issue that was contested at that trial. This Court unanimously found the record in Sealfon v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, sufficient to justify such a conclusion. Cf. Emich Motors Corp. v. GeneralSearch
-
Harris v. StateSearch
-
People v. GrzesczakSearch
-
petitioner was present at the scene of the robbery. Page 356 U. S. 477 The Court's effort to enlist Brock v. NorthSearch
-
Amendment. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, with whom MR. JUSTICE BLACK concurs, dissenting. We recently stated in Green v. UnitedSearch
-
was indicted for robbing one of the remaining five named individuals. The criminal transaction, unlike that in Burton v. UnitedSearch
-
See Brock v. NorthSearch
-
Gavieres v. UnitedSearch
-
to their independence, has not been deemed an authoritative construction of the constitutional provision. See Green v. UnitedSearch
-
Chitty, Criminal Law (5th Am. ed. 1847), 455. To like effect is State v. ShepardSearch
-
State v. CooperSearch
-
Commonwealth v. RobySearch
-
The result I reach does not square with Palko v. ConnecticutSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hoag v. NewSearch
-
the States. Palko v. ConnecticutSearch
-
See Hurtado v. CaliforniaSearch
-
In Brock v. NorthSearch
-
Yates v. UnitedSearch
-
Niemotko v. MarylandSearch
-
People v. RogersSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial