Citation network
Thomas Vs. Arizona
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 19, 1958
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 390 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court Thomas v. ArizonaSearch
-
U.S. 390 (1958) Thomas v. ArizonaSearch
-
The prosecution's use of a coerced confession first led to this Court's reversal of a state conviction in Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
Malinski v. NewSearch
-
involves the application of constitutional standards of fundamental fairness under the Fourteenth Amendment. See Brown v. AllenSearch
-
U. S. 191 , 352 U. S. 197 (1957), quoting Stein v. NewSearch
-
here is posited solely upon the roping incidents. There is no claim and no evidence of physical beating, as in Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
of continuous relay questioning, as in Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of incommunicado detention, as in Fikes v. AlabamaSearch
-
or of psychiatric inducement, as in Leyra v. DennoSearch
-
U. S. 556 (1954). Petitioner is neither of tender age, as was the accused in Haley v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 596 (1948), nor of subnormal intelligence, as was the defendant in Fikes v. AlabamaSearch
-
refused Page 356 U. S. 403 to consider disputed facts when determining the issue of coercion. See Gallegos v. NebraskaSearch
-
of the record without a full hearing. The granting of a hearing is within the discretion of the District Court, Brown v. AllenSearch
-
that certiorari must be applied for here after a state conviction before habeas is sought in the District Court, Darr v. BurfordSearch
-
U. S. 200 (1950), is not inflexible, however, and, in special circumstances, need not be complied with. Darr v. BurfordSearch
-
that a prisoner be taken before a magistrate without unnecessary delay after the arrest. Contrast, e.g., Fikes v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 547 . The Arizona statute, see note 2 supra, was construed in State v. JohnsonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Thomas v. ArizonaSearch
-
Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
the Fourteenth Amendment. See Brown v. AllenSearch
-
Stein v. NewSearch
-
See Gallegos v. NebraskaSearch
-
of the District Court, Brown v. AllenSearch
-
the District Court, Darr v. BurfordSearch
-
State v. JohnsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial