Citation network
United States Vs. Dow
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 09, 1958
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 17 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. DowSearch
-
U.S. 17 (1958) United States v. DowSearch
-
under the Texas practice, which at that time was applicable to federal condemnation proceedings. See United States v. MillerSearch
-
the voluntary assignment of a compensation claim against the Government for the taking of property. United States v. ShannonSearch
-
argues, an assignment taking effect by operation of law, and thus not within the Act's prohibition. Cf. United States v. AetnaSearch
-
Tracts of Land v. UnitedSearch
-
Danforth v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. DickinsonSearch
-
a)(2) and 1491, to recover just compensation. See Hurley v. KincaidSearch
-
title to the property passes to the Government only when the owner receives compensation, see Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
date as of which the land is to be valued and the Government's obligation to pay interest accrues. See United States v. LynahSearch
-
United States v. RogersSearch
-
Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Tracts of Land v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Catlin v. UnitedSearch
-
of interest from the time of filing to the date of judgment in the eminent domain proceedings. See United States v. MillerSearch
-
Parks v. BostonSearch
-
Pick., Mass., 198, 208. See also Anderson v. UnitedSearch
-
it had already been in possession, to the exclusion of the property owner, for some time. Cf. Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
For instance, if a single tract of land were worth more than the sum of its component parcels, cf. United States v. RunnerSearch
-
an alteration in the property interest taken -- from full ownership to one of temporary use and occupation. O'Connor v. UnitedSearch
-
Moody v. WickardSearch
-
Cherokee Nation v. SouthernSearch
-
by the principles normally governing the taking of a right to use property temporarily. See Kimball Laundry Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. PettySearch
-
United States v. GeneralSearch
-
of condemnation proceedings, and would conflict with the policies underlying the Anti-Assignment Act. See Hobbs v. McLeanSearch
-
United States v. AetnaSearch
-
Casualty & Surety Co., supra. Page 357 U. S. 27 Dow relies on Danforth v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, and United States v. DickinsonSearch
-
to prevent the application of the correct rule of law as between the Government and Dow in this case. Cf. McKenzie v. IrvingSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. DowSearch
-
See United States v. MillerSearch
-
Cf. United States v. AetnaSearch
-
See Hurley v. KincaidSearch
-
Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. LynahSearch
-
Anderson v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. RunnerSearch
-
O'Connor v. UnitedSearch
-
Cherokee Nation v. SouthernSearch
-
See Kimball Laundry Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the Anti-Assignment Act. See Hobbs v. McLeanSearch
-
and United States v. DickinsonSearch
-
Cf. McKenzie v. IrvingSearch
-
United States v. DickinsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial