Citation network
Kent Vs. Dulles
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 16, 1958
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 116 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court Kent v. DullesSearch
-
U.S. 116 (1958) Kent v. DullesSearch
-
S. 881. The Court first noted the function that the passport performed in American law in the case of Urtetiqui v. D'ArbelSearch
-
it is also an aid in establishing citizenship for purposes of reentry into the United States. See Browder v. UnitedSearch
-
executive construction should be enough, it is said, to warrant the inference that Congress had adopted it. See Allen v. GrandSearch
-
United States v. Allen-BradleySearch
-
the choice of what he eats, or wears, or reads. Freedom of movement is basic in our scheme of values. See Crandall v. NevadaSearch
-
problem of statutory construction with problems that may arise under the war power. Cf. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSearch
-
U. S. 579 . In a case of comparable magnitude, Korematsu v. UnitedSearch
-
is to be regulated, it must be pursuant to the lawmaking functions of the Congress. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
power is delegated, the standards must be adequate to pass scrutiny by the accepted tests. See Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSearch
-
U. S. 388 , 293 U. S. 420 -430. Cf. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSearch
-
that curtail or dilute them. See Ex parte Endo, 323 U. S. 283 , 323 U. S. 301 -302. Cf. Hannegan v. EsquireSearch
-
See Perkins v. ElgSearch
-
Page 357 U. S. 132 This discretionary authority, which we previously acknowledged in Perkins v. ElgSearch
-
of the 1952 Act. Cf. United States v. PleshaSearch
-
without in any way limiting the discretionary passport power theretofore exercised by the Secretary. See United States v. Allen-BradleySearch
-
Allen v. GrandSearch
-
United States v. CerecedoSearch
-
view of that, it would be inappropriate for me, as a dissenter, to consider those questions at this time. Cf. Peters v. HobbySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Kent v. DullesSearch
-
of Urtetiqui v. D'ArbelSearch
-
the United States. See Browder v. UnitedSearch
-
See Allen v. GrandSearch
-
See Crandall v. NevadaSearch
-
Cf. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSearch
-
Korematsu v. UnitedSearch
-
of the Congress. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSearch
-
See Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSearch
-
Cf. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSearch
-
Cf. Hannegan v. EsquireSearch
-
Act. Cf. United States v. PleshaSearch
-
the Secretary. See United States v. Allen-BradleySearch
-
Cf. Peters v. HobbySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial