Citation network
Flora Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 16, 1958
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Flora v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 357 U.S. 63 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court Flora v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 357 U.S. 63 (1958) Flora v. UnitedSearch
-
We granted certiorari, 355 U.S. 881, to resolve the conflict between that decision and Bushmiaer v. UnitedSearch
-
meaning of words employed. The principle of strict construction of waivers of sovereign immunity, United States v. MichelSearch
-
took the form of an action of assumpsit against the collector. Page 357 U. S. 67 See Philadelphia v. DiehlSearch
-
a), was considered in Cheatham v. UnitedSearch
-
and that language included suits to obtain refund of income taxes. United States v. EmerySearch
-
to the Commissioner clearly applied to the Tucker Act cases, United States v. MichelSearch
-
A suit against the office or the successor in office of a deceased collector could not be maintained. Smietanka v. IndianaSearch
-
amount limitation of the Tucker Act in the special situation where the Collector could not be sued. See Lowe Bros. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
combine as persuasive indications that no change was intended in the full payment principle declared in Cheatham v. UnitedSearch
-
Congress was concerned was the hardship of prelitigation payment, not post-litigation collection. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSearch
-
Court. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is Affirmed. MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER, believing that Bushmiaer v. UnitedSearch
-
Sirian Lamp Co. v. ManningSearch
-
F.2d 776, and Coates v. UnitedSearch
-
Suhr v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 18 F.2d 81. But cf. Sirian Lamp Co. v. ManningSearch
-
Sirian Lamp Co. v. ManningSearch
-
Coates v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 111 F.2d 609. But cf. Bendheim v. CommissionerSearch
-
Elbert v. JohnsonSearch
-
Initially, such suits depended upon diversity jurisdiction. Collector v. HubbardSearch
-
See Lowe Bros. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Pollock v. Farmers'Search
-
E.g., Phillips v. CommissionerSearch
-
United States v. JeffersonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Flora v. UnitedSearch
-
and Bushmiaer v. UnitedSearch
-
See Philadelphia v. DiehlSearch
-
Cheatham v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. EmerySearch
-
Smietanka v. IndianaSearch
-
Bushmiaer v. UnitedSearch
-
and Coates v. UnitedSearch
-
Suhr v. UnitedSearch
-
Bendheim v. CommissionerSearch
-
Collector v. HubbardSearch
-
Dobson v. CommissionerSearch
-
Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial