Citation network
ivanhoe Irrigation Dist. Vs. Mccracken
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 23, 1958
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 275 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court Ivanhoe Irrigation Dist. v. McCrackenSearch
-
U.S. 275 (1958) Ivanhoe Irrigation Dist. v. McCrackenSearch
-
finding the contracts invalid on several grounds. Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. AllSearch
-
Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. AllSearch
-
Madera Irrigation District v. AllSearch
-
Albonico v. MaderaSearch
-
both finding a common outlet to the ocean Page 357 U. S. 281 through San Francisco Bay. See United States v. GerlachSearch
-
therefore, that, in putting together the mosaic of Central Valley, some litigation would ensue. See United States v. GerlachSearch
-
which the United States has purchased outright. Water rights surrounding these areas were involved in United States v. GerlachSearch
-
States under the contracts, these are matters of federal law on which this Court has final word, Clearfield Trust Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
as not necessary to decision here the question of title to or vested rights in unappropriated water. Cf. Nebraska v. WyomingSearch
-
by the United States are insufficient, then it must acquire those necessary to carry on the project, United States v. GerlachSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
acquisition of water rights must not be confused with the operation of federal projects. As the Court said in Nebraska v. WyomingSearch
-
of administrative construction, and confirmation and approval of the contracts. Page 357 U. S. 294 Fleming v. MohawkSearch
-
Swayne & Hoyt Ltd. v. UnitedSearch
-
authority to establish and execute the Central Valley and Santa Barbara County projects. As we said in United States v. GerlachSearch
-
Id. at 339 U. S. 738 . The Santa Barbara Project is supportable on the same grounds. Cf. United States v. ButlerSearch
-
relating to the management and disposal of federal property. As this Court said in United States v. SanSearch
-
United States v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 19 (1947), and Alabama v. TexasSearch
-
to impose reasonable conditions on the use of federal funds, federal property, and federal privileges. See Berman v. ParkerSearch
-
U. S. 26 (1954), and Federal Power Comm'n v. IdahoSearch
-
federal property on terms other than those prescribed or authorized by Congress. Public Utilities Comm'n of California v. UnitedSearch
-
of debtor-creditor is maintained. In the light of these facts, we believe that the language of the Court in Wickard v. FilburnSearch
-
Together with No. 123, Madera Irrigation District et al. v. SteinerSearch
-
et al., No. 124, Madera Irrigation District v. AlbonicoSearch
-
et ux., and No. 125, Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. BalaamSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ivanhoe Irrigation Dist. v. McCrackenSearch
-
Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. AllSearch
-
San Francisco Bay. See United States v. GerlachSearch
-
See United States v. GerlachSearch
-
United States v. GerlachSearch
-
Clearfield Trust Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Nebraska v. WyomingSearch
-
Fleming v. MohawkSearch
-
Cf. United States v. ButlerSearch
-
United States v. SanSearch
-
United States v. CaliforniaSearch
-
and Alabama v. TexasSearch
-
See Berman v. ParkerSearch
-
and Federal Power Comm'n v. IdahoSearch
-
Congress. Public Utilities Comm'n of California v. UnitedSearch
-
Madera Irrigation District v. AlbonicoSearch
-
Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. BalaamSearch
-
Nebraska v. WyomingSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial