Citation network
Lerner Vs. Casey
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 30, 1958
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 468 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court Lerner v. CaseySearch
-
U.S. 468 (1958) Lerner v. CaseySearch
-
questions relevant to his employment put to him by his employer. Pp. 357 U. S. 475 -476. (b) Slochower v. BoardSearch
-
Cf. Sweezy v. NewSearch
-
on mere present membership in the Communist Party, without regard to the character of such membership, cf. Wieman v. UpdegraffSearch
-
of the policy behind the Fifth Amendment privilege and contrary to the teaching of this Court's decision in Slochower v. BoardSearch
-
a finding of doubtful trust and reliability could justifiably be based on appellant's lack of frankness, cf. Garner v. BoardSearch
-
Beilan v. BoardSearch
-
it seems clear that the discharge here Page 357 U. S. 477 in any event was unlike that in Slochower v. BoardSearch
-
directed to present membership where the refusal rests on the belief that an answer might incriminate, cf. Adamson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
can be relied upon as a ground for denial of state employment. Cf. Wieman v. UpdegraffSearch
-
Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Schware v. BoardSearch
-
what must be conceded to have been a question relevant to the purposes of the statute and his employment, cf. Garner v. BoardSearch
-
Tot v. UnitedSearch
-
relevant to his employment, and that present membership in the Communist Party is such a matter. See also Beilan v. BoardSearch
-
employer evidences doubt as to his trust and reliability. Finally, unlike the situation involved in Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
self-incrimination was not available to appellant through the Fourteenth Amendment in this state investigation. Knapp v. SchweitzerSearch
-
Wilson v. UnitedSearch
-
Slochower v. BoardSearch
-
Grunewald v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 477 , infra ), to be equivalent to an assertion of a claim of possible self-incrimination. See Quinn v. UnitedSearch
-
Emspak v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lerner v. CaseySearch
-
Garner v. BoardSearch
-
Cf. Wieman v. UpdegraffSearch
-
See Quinn v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial