Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Beilan Vs. Board of Education

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 30, 1958

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

59 entries 4 linked 55 unlinked
Show
  1. Lane Vs. Wilson US Supreme Court · May 22, 1939
  2. Murdock Vs. Pennsylvania US Supreme Court · May 03, 1943
  3. Wieman Vs. Updegraff US Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1952
  4. Lerner Vs. Casey US Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1958
  5. Beilan v. Board
    Search
  6. of Education - 357 U.S. 399 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court Beilan v. Board
    Search
  7. of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) Beilan v. Board
    Search
  8. of its employees as to matters that may prove relevant to their fitness and suitability for the public service. Garner v. Board
    Search
  9. to answer his Superintendent's questions is not supported by the record. P. 357 U. S. 408 . (g) Slochower v. Board
    Search
  10. of Education, 350 U. S. 551 , and Konigsberg v. State
    Search
  11. are bound by the interpretation thus given to the Pennsylvania statutes by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Barsky v. Board
    Search
  12. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. Risty
    Search
  13. Adler v. Board
    Search
  14. of Education, 342 U. S. 485 , 342 U. S. 493 . As this Court stated in Garner v. Board
    Search
  15. gave him ample opportunity to consult counsel. There was no element of surprise. Our recent decisions in Slochower v. Board
    Search
  16. of Higher Education, 350 U. S. 551 , and Konigsberg v. State
    Search
  17. Political Association was the predecessor organization of the Communist Party of the United States. See Yates v. United
    Search
  18. There is no showing that the statute was discriminatorily applied. Cf. Yick Wo v. Hopkins
    Search
  19. Fifth Amendment before a congressional committee is an invalid basis for discharge from public employment, Slochower v. Board
    Search
  20. a state court's conclusion that permissible bases existed on which the decision might have rested. Stromberg v. California
    Search
  21. Williams v. North
    Search
  22. of the citizens that are guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment are those contained in the First Amendment. Stromberg v. California
    Search
  23. De Jonge v. Oregon
    Search
  24. Everson v. Board
    Search
  25. Staub v. City
    Search
  26. the privilege of selecting his own path to salvation. The Court put the matter succinctly in Board of Education v. Barnette
    Search
  27. we have here. It is government action that the Fourteenth and First Amendments protect against. We emphasized in NAACP v. Alabama
    Search
  28. the most we can assume from their failure to answer is that they were Communists. Yet, as we said in Wieman v. Updegraff
    Search
  29. N.Y.2d 355, 378, 161 N.Y.S.2d 7, 25, 141 N.E.2d 533, 546. Our initial error in all this business ( see Dennis v. United
    Search
  30. In an analogous situation, Judge Pope stated the problem for the Court of Appeals in Parker v. Lester
    Search
  31. and distrust of his loyalty on account of his political beliefs and associations. Page 357 U. S. 419 NAACP v. Alabama
    Search
  32. in which the State carries the burden of proving specific charges by a fair preponderance of evidence. Cf. Adler v. Board
    Search
  33. arbitrary exercise of power is no less when the state courts refuse to recognize what his in fact occurred. Cf. Payne v. Arkansas
    Search
  34. Moore v. Michigan
    Search
  35. U. S. 155 . See also Broad River Power Co. v. South
    Search
  36. Board of Public Education School District of Philadelphia v. Beilan
    Search
  37. Pa. 82, 99, 125 A.2d 327, 335 (Jones, J., dissenting). LERNER V. CASEY
    Search
  38. record is wholly devoid of the essential requisite of evidence to support the ultimate finding of disloyalty. Cf. Tot v. United
    Search
  39. New York cannot lack procedures under which he could have been discharged without blemishing his name. BEILAN V. BOARD
    Search
  40. It is this administrative record which Beilan must present to his next employer. Cf. Harmon v. Brucker
    Search
  41. U.S. Supreme Court Beilan v. Board
    Search
  42. Garner v. Board
    Search
  43. Slochower v. Board
    Search
  44. and Konigsberg v. State
    Search
  45. the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Barsky v. Board
    Search
  46. of the Communist Party of the United States. See Yates v. United
    Search
  47. Cf. Yick Wo v. Hopkins
    Search
  48. Stromberg v. California
    Search
  49. Williams v. North
    Search
  50. the First Amendment. Stromberg v. California
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial