Citation network
Gore Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 30, 1958
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Gore v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 357 U.S. 386 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court Gore v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 357 U.S. 386 (1958) Gore v. UnitedSearch
-
sentences were not unlawful. Pp. 357 U. S. 387 -393. (a) The Court adheres to the decision in Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
be treated as a single offense when committed through a single sale. Pp. 357 U. S. 390 -391. (c) Bell v. UnitedSearch
-
S.App.D.C. 315, 244 F.2d 763, with expressions of doubt by two of the judges, who felt themselves bound by Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
but moving in related areas, may not have impaired its authority. We adhere to the decision in Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
one of these offenses. This situation is toto coelo different from the one that led to our decision in Bell v. UnitedSearch
-
severity, toward violation of the narcotics laws. Nor need we be detained by two other cases relied on, United States v. UniversalSearch
-
C.I.T. Credit Corp., 344 U. S. 218 , and Prince v. UnitedSearch
-
Carter v. McClaughrySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Albrecht v. UnitedSearch
-
Pinkerton v. UnitedSearch
-
American Tobacco Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MichenerSearch
-
Pereira v. UnitedSearch
-
For typical expressions of the attitudes of these members of the Court, see, e.g., Horning v. DistrictSearch
-
Olmstead v. UnitedSearch
-
Sorrells v. UnitedSearch
-
the courts were warranted in punishing petitioner three times for the same transaction. I realize that Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
that case. I find that course necessary because of my views on double jeopardy, recently expressed in Hoag v. NewSearch
-
for three prosecutions. The different evidence test, which was adopted without much analysis by the Court in Carter v. McClaughrySearch
-
protect the citizen from more than one trial for the same act. That analysis was adopted by the Court in Ballerini v. AderholtSearch
-
Cf. Mr. Justice Rutledge concurring in District of Columbia v. BuckleySearch
-
Regina v. ElringtonSearch
-
Cox C.C. 86, 90, 1 B. & S. 688. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, dissenting. Even assuming the vitality of Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Gore v. UnitedSearch
-
Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
Bell v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. UniversalSearch
-
and Prince v. UnitedSearch
-
Horning v. DistrictSearch
-
Hoag v. NewSearch
-
Ballerini v. AderholtSearch
-
District of Columbia v. BuckleySearch
-
of Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial