Citation network
Leedom Vs. Kyne
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 15, 1958
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 184 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court Leedom v. KyneSearch
-
U.S. 184 (1958) Leedom v. KyneSearch
-
unless the review provisions of the National Labor Relations Act destroyed it. In American Federation of Labor v. LaborSearch
-
case squarely presents the question found not to have been presented by the record in American Federation of Labor v. LaborSearch
-
has jurisdiction of an original suit to prevent deprivation of a right so given. In Texas & New Orleans R. Co. v. RailwaySearch
-
Id. at 281 U. S. 568 -569. And compare Virginian R. Co. v. SystemSearch
-
Federation, 300 U. S. 515 . In Switchmen's Union v. NationalSearch
-
of those courts to control. That was the purport of the decisions of this Court in Texas & New Orleans R. Co. v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
Clerks, 281 U. S. 548 , and Virginian R. Co. v. SystemSearch
-
has given professional employees, for there is no other means within their control ( American Federation of Labor v. LaborSearch
-
intend judicial protection of rights it confers against agency action taken in excess of delegated powers. Cf. Harmon v. BruckerSearch
-
Texas & New Orleans R. Co. v. RailwaySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
that time-consuming review might defeat the objectives of the national labor policy. See American Federation of Labor v. LaborSearch
-
Madden v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
The Court, borrowing a statement from Switchmen's Union v. NationalSearch
-
as is review of any other type of Board decision. That appears from the timetable in Inland Empire District Council v. MillisSearch
-
The Court supports its decision by stating that Switchmen's Union v. NationalSearch
-
but no tribunal for its enforcement. This was the case in Texas & New Orleans R. Co. v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
of Railway Clerks, 281 U. S. 548 , and Virginian R. Co. v. SystemSearch
-
Cases such as Harmon v. BruckerSearch
-
U. S. 579 , and Stark v. WickardSearch
-
contrary. Each case must turn on an interpretation of the statute that creates the right. As this Court said in Stark v. WickardSearch
-
the judicial enforcement of the rights created, so compellingly demonstrated in this case, and in Switchmen's Union v. NationalSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Leedom v. KyneSearch
-
In American Federation of Labor v. LaborSearch
-
American Federation of Labor v. LaborSearch
-
In Texas & New Orleans R. Co. v. RailwaySearch
-
Virginian R. Co. v. SystemSearch
-
In Switchmen's Union v. NationalSearch
-
Texas & New Orleans R. Co. v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
and Virginian R. Co. v. SystemSearch
-
Cf. Harmon v. BruckerSearch
-
See American Federation of Labor v. LaborSearch
-
Switchmen's Union v. NationalSearch
-
Inland Empire District Council v. MillisSearch
-
and Stark v. WickardSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial