Citation network
Fikes Vs. Alabama
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 14, 1957
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 191 (1957) U.S. Supreme Court Fikes v. AlabamaSearch
-
U.S. 191 (1957) Fikes v. AlabamaSearch
-
the prior cases. The objective facts in the present case are very much like those that were before the Court in Turner v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
was a weaker and more susceptible subject than the record in that case reveals Turner to have been. And cf. Johnson v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
allowable limits. The use of the confessions secured in this setting was a denial of due process. Neither Stein v. NewSearch
-
That is the same standard that has been utilized in each case, according to its total facts. Cf. e.g., Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
violation of this requirement does not render inadmissible a confession secured during such detention. See Ingram v. StateSearch
-
Stein v. NewSearch
-
of prompt arraignment prevailing in most States is, in and of itself, not a denial of due process. Cf. McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
Process Clause to state convictions secured on the basis of confessions has been attempted in my opinions in Malinski v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
over state courts in criminal cases is narrower than that which it exercises over the lower federal courts. Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
tactics, such as were condemned in Turner v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Prison, after authorization by a state circuit judge, stands on quite a different footing from the episode in Ward v. TexasSearch
-
was any deliberate purpose to keep the petitioner incommunicado, such as existed in Page 352 U. S. 201 Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
supra, and Harris v. SouthSearch
-
Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
Harris v. SouthSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Fikes v. AlabamaSearch
-
Johnson v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Neither Stein v. NewSearch
-
See Ingram v. StateSearch
-
Cf. McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
Malinski v. NewSearch
-
Ward v. TexasSearch
-
and Harris v. SouthSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial