Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Pollard Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 25, 1957

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 3 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Hill Vs. Wampler US Supreme Court · May 18, 1936
  2. Beavers Vs. Haubert US Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1905
  3. Dowd Vs. Cook US Supreme Court · Jan 02, 1951
  4. Pollard v. United
    Search
  5. States - 352 U.S. 354 (1957) U.S. Supreme Court Pollard v. United
    Search
  6. States, 352 U.S. 354 (1957) Pollard v. United
    Search
  7. from federal prison in March, 1956, after his petition for certiorari had been granted. He relies on United States v. Morgan
    Search
  8. U. S. 502 , 346 U. S. 512 -513, and Fiswick v. United
    Search
  9. that review in this Court will be allowed only where its judgment will have some material effect. Cf. St. Pierre v. United
    Search
  10. we might well have considered those questions neither preserved below nor raised in the petition. Cf. Price v. Johnston
    Search
  11. for distinguishing between an oral pronouncement of sentence and its entry on the records of the court. Cf. Spriggs v. United
    Search
  12. Roberts v. United
    Search
  13. a court has power to enter sentence at a succeeding term where a void sentence had been previously imposed. Miller v. Aderhold
    Search
  14. Bozza v. United
    Search
  15. here occurred amounts to an unconstitutional deprivation of rights depends upon the circumstances. See, e.g., Beavers v. Haubert
    Search
  16. Frankel v. Woodrough
    Search
  17. We do not have in this case circumstances akin to those in United States v. Provoo
    Search
  18. which the accused attempted to correct. The same situation existed in United States v. McWilliams
    Search
  19. of a prosecution resulting in conviction calls for the correction of the error, not the release of the accused. Dowd v. Cook
    Search
  20. Cf. Pino v. Landon
    Search
  21. U.S. 901, reversing Pino v. Nicolls
    Search
  22. Such an order is reviewable on certiorari. Wells v. United
    Search
  23. No question is raised as to the length of the 1954 sentence. Cf. Roberts v. United
    Search
  24. Miller v. Aderhold
    Search
  25. U. S. 206 , 288 U. S. 210 -211. Cf. Korematsu v. United
    Search
  26. Berman v. United
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Pollard v. United
    Search
  28. United States v. Morgan
    Search
  29. and Fiswick v. United
    Search
  30. Cf. St. Pierre v. United
    Search
  31. Cf. Price v. Johnston
    Search
  32. Cf. Spriggs v. United
    Search
  33. Bozza v. United
    Search
  34. United States v. Provoo
    Search
  35. United States v. McWilliams
    Search
  36. Pino v. Nicolls
    Search
  37. Wells v. United
    Search
  38. Cf. Roberts v. United
    Search
  39. Cf. Korematsu v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial