Citation network
Chessman Vs. Teets
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 10, 1957
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 156 (1957) U.S. Supreme Court Chessman v. TeetsSearch
-
U.S. 156 (1957) Chessman v. TeetsSearch
-
The Supreme Court of the State of California affirmed petitioner's conviction by a divided court. People v. ChessmanSearch
-
the record, as thus settled, was upheld by the California Supreme Court, first upon the motion just mentioned, People v. ChessmanSearch
-
the petitioner was entitled to be represented throughout those proceedings either in person or by counsel. See Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
Dowdell v. UnitedSearch
-
Cole v. ArkansasSearch
-
proceedings in propria persona, it then became incumbent on the State to appoint counsel for him. Cf. Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion, failing which the petitioner shall be discharged. Cf. Dowd v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
See Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
Certainly this Court's previous denials of certiorari, Chessman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. 864, do not foreclose us from now granting appropriate relief. Brown v. AllenSearch
-
In Mooney v. HolohanSearch
-
denial of constitutional rights some 18 years after the petitioner had been convicted in a state court. See also Price v. JohnstonSearch
-
between the prosecutor and the substitute reporter, for such was the finding of the District Court. Chessman v. TeetsSearch
-
confession obtained from Chessman. The confession was held admissible by the Supreme Court of California. People v. ChessmanSearch
-
prolonged detention by the police on the voluntary character of the confession, the type of problem presented in Haley v. OhioSearch
-
and Harris v. SouthSearch
-
Carolina, 338 U. S. 68 . The Court denied certiorari. Chessman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
from a state court presents only darkly or obliquely an important constitutional issue. Perhaps, as in Massey v. MooreSearch
-
and perhaps only then can the basic constitutional defect be laid bare. Such, for example, was the situation in Moore v. DempseySearch
-
and Leyra v. DennoSearch
-
corpus to issue), then we should have granted certiorari when the Supreme Court of California first held, in People v. ChessmanSearch
-
decision of the California Supreme Court was announced May 19, 1950. We denied certiorari on October 9, 1950. Chessman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
the voir dire examination of jurors and the prosecutor's opening statement. Further relief was denied. People v. ChessmanSearch
-
in which the trial judge considered objections to the transcript. Certiorari was denied on October 9, 1950. Chessman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Certiorari and the motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus were denied on May 14, 1951. Chessman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. 929. The California Supreme Court affirmed Chessman's conviction on December 18, 1951. People v. ChessmanSearch
-
statute under which he was sentenced to death was unconstitutional. Certiorari was denied on March 31, 1952. Chessman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed that decision in May 28, 1953. Chessman v. PeopleSearch
-
giving him the opportunity to prove the inaccuracy or fraud. Certiorari was denied on December 14, 1953. Chessman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Chessman v. CaliforniaSearch
-
of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, on April 7, 1955, affirmed the District Court decision. Chessman v. TeetsSearch
-
was reversed, and the case remanded to the District Court for a hearing on Chessman's allegations of fraud. Chessman v. TeetsSearch
-
to the jury had been accurately reported, the District Court discharged the writ on January 31, 1956. Chessman v. TeetsSearch
-
F.Supp. 761. The Court of Appeals affirmed on October 18, 1956. Chessman v. TeetsSearch
-
People v. SuperiorSearch
-
In re Chessman and People v. SuperiorSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Chessman v. TeetsSearch
-
People v. ChessmanSearch
-
See Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
Dowdell v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
Cf. Dowd v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial