Citation network
Curcio Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 10, 1957
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Curcio v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 354 U.S. 118 (1957) U.S. Supreme Court Curcio v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 354 U.S. 118 (1957) Curcio v. UnitedSearch
-
officer may not withhold testimony or documents on the ground that his corporation would be incriminated. Hale v. HenkelSearch
-
books or records withhold them on the ground that he personally might be incriminated by their production. Wilson v. UnitedSearch
-
Essgee Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
stockholders, the transferees may not invoke their privilege with respect to the former corporate records. Grant v. UnitedSearch
-
Wheeler v. UnitedSearch
-
of governmental authorities by a claim of personal privilege on the part of their custodian. In United States v. WhiteSearch
-
id. at 322 U. S. 696 ). And, in Shapiro v. UnitedSearch
-
only with respect to the production of the records themselves. Wilson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 221 U. S. 361 , 221 U. S. 380 . United States v. Austin-BagleySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Page 354 U. S. 126 The Government cites but one federal case, United States v. FieldSearch
-
Hoffman v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 341 U. S. 479 , 341 U. S. 486 -487. See also Trock v. UnitedSearch
-
Emspak v. UnitedSearch
-
Singleton v. UnitedSearch
-
Greenberg v. UnitedSearch
-
Pulford v. UnitedSearch
-
Lumber Products Assn. v. UnitedSearch
-
Carolene Products Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. IllinoisSearch
-
Alcohol Co., 45 F.2d 145, 149. See also, United States v. LaySearch
-
The leading case of United States v. Austin-BagleySearch
-
compelling the producer to declare that the documents are genuine. . . . Hence, it appears to us that the case Heike v. UnitedSearch
-
The Government also cites Bleakley v. SchlesingerSearch
-
pursuant to a subpoena must give a reasonable explanation or suffer the penalty for nonproduction. But cf. Bradley v. O'HareSearch
-
in which two of the same judges participated, contradict the statement contained in the Field case. In United States v. DaisartSearch
-
Id. at 862. Subsequently, in United States v. PattersonSearch
-
Lopiparo v. UnitedSearch
-
have been proceeded against for his failure to produce the records demanded by the subpoena duces tecum. See Nilva v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WhiteSearch
-
Wilson v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Curcio v. UnitedSearch
-
Grant v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. WhiteSearch
-
Shapiro v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. Austin-BagleySearch
-
Trock v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. LaySearch
-
of United States v. Austin-BagleySearch
-
Heike v. UnitedSearch
-
Bleakley v. SchlesingerSearch
-
Bradley v. O'HareSearch
-
In United States v. DaisartSearch
-
United States v. PattersonSearch
-
Lopiparo v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial