Citation network
Vanderbilt Vs. Vanderbilt
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 24, 1957
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 416 (1957) U.S. Supreme Court Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSearch
-
U.S. 416 (1957) Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSearch
-
We granted certiorari, 352 U.S. 820. In Estin v. EstinSearch
-
Petitioner claims that this case is governed by Thompson v. ThompsonSearch
-
U. S. 551 . For the reasons given in a concurring opinion in Armstrong v. ArmstrongSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to the husband's duty to support the wife -- provided, of course, that the Nevada courts had power to do this. Sweeney v. SweeneySearch
-
Herrick v. HerrickSearch
-
Nev. 59, 68, 25 P.2d 378, 380. See Estin v. EstinSearch
-
See Pennington v. FourthSearch
-
in a State, it can adjudicate his obligations, but only to the extent of his interest in that property. Pennington v. FourthSearch
-
A concurring opinion in Armstrong v. ArmstrongSearch
-
and the authorities collected there, set forth in greater detail the reasons underlying this holding. Cf. Meredith v. MeredithSearch
-
jurisdiction over respondent that must be respected, by command of the Constitution, by every other State, Williams v. NorthSearch
-
alimony to which sister States must also give full faith and credit. Whatever the answer to the question may be, Estin v. EstinSearch
-
citing for this proposition Pennoyer v. NeffSearch
-
clarity to give a brief review of the singular history of matrimonial law in this Court since the decision in Atherton v. AthertonSearch
-
a divorce granted, on the basis of constructive service, by the matrimonial domicile to a deserted husband. In Haddock v. HaddockSearch
-
other than the matrimonial domicile. These precedents were applied to the incidental claim to alimony in Thompson v. ThompsonSearch
-
to be given full faith and credit despite the lack of personal jurisdiction over the other spouse. In Williams v. NorthSearch
-
one spouse was domiciled. The limitation of ex parte divorces to the matrimonial domicile imposed by Haddock v. HaddockSearch
-
Williams v. NorthSearch
-
facts underlying a divorce when both parties had merely made an appearance in the original divorce proceeding. Sherrer v. SherrerSearch
-
U. S. 343 , and Coe v. CoeSearch
-
were made by a third party who had not appeared in the original proceeding and who had independent interests. Johnson v. MuelbergerSearch
-
I through Johnson resulted in a broad extension of the scope of the Full Faith and Credit Clause. Haddock v. HaddockSearch
-
of divorce in Sherrer and Coe. One might have expected that, since Thompson v. ThompsonSearch
-
supra, was based on Haddock v. HaddockSearch
-
The Court shrinks from applying Williams I to Thompson. In fact, we are now told that the vice of Thompson v. ThompsonSearch
-
I, are now to be enlarged so far as alimony is concerned. The requirement Page 354 U. S. 423 of Pennoyer v. NeffSearch
-
of the parties and the nature of what is adjudicated that, constitutionally, it may be treated alike. Haddock v. HaddockSearch
-
and Thompson v. ThompsonSearch
-
This is a far cry from what was involved in Hughes v. FetterSearch
-
domicile provides a basis of jurisdiction that would be sufficient in an ordinary nonmatrimonial action. See Williams v. NorthSearch
-
have been few and far between, apart from Haddock v. HaddockSearch
-
See Williams v. NorthSearch
-
American Bank & Trust Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Custody over children presents an entirely different problem. See May v. AndersonSearch
-
well as in New York -- under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, pursuant to the doctrine of Pennoyer v. NeffSearch
-
the marriage status of a domiciliary without personal service over the absent spouse (as it clearly is, see Williams v. NorthSearch
-
valid in the State where rendered, see the dissent of Mr. Justice Stone and Mr. Justice Cardozo in Yarborough v. YarboroughSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial