Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Yates Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 25, 1957

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Yates v. United
    Search
  2. States - 355 U.S. 66 (1957) U.S. Supreme Court Yates v. United
    Search
  3. States, 355 U.S. 66 (1957) Yates v. United
    Search
  4. U. S. 72 I While imprisonment cannot be used to coerce evidence after a trial has terminated, Yates v. United
    Search
  5. Gompers v. Bucks
    Search
  6. management of the trial rests with the judge, and no party can be permitted to usurp that function. See United States v. Gates
    Search
  7. on the same subject of inquiry within which a recalcitrant witness already has refused answers. See United States v. Orman
    Search
  8. petitioner on the first day of her cross-examination. The Government admits, pursuant to the holding of United States v. Costello
    Search
  9. that the same act may give rise to these distinct sanctions presents no double jeopardy problem. Rex Trailer Co. v. United
    Search
  10. United States v. United
    Search
  11. This Court reversed the convictions in the principal case. Yates v. United
    Search
  12. appeal on the ground that petitioner could not purge herself of the civil contempt, since the trial had ended. Yates v. United
    Search
  13. no notice at the time of the trial that he expected to hold her in criminal contempt for the June 26 refusals. Yates v. United
    Search
  14. Cf. Nilva v. United
    Search
  15. allowed to multiply the contempts by repeating the questions. The correct rule, I believe, is stated in United States v. Costello
    Search
  16. Or, as stated in United States v. Orman
    Search
  17. as well as civil coercion, for the contempt she committed upon her first refusal to testify. See Penfield Co. v. SEC
    Search
  18. by the Court of Appeals for his failure to give her the necessary notice during the pendency of the trial. Yates v. United
    Search
  19. the judgment of conviction in the main case was pending on appeal. The Court of Appeals ordered her released ( Yates v. United
    Search
  20. has not urged that this charge of criminal contempt should have been tried before some other judge. Cf. Offutt v. United
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court Yates v. United
    Search
  22. Gompers v. Bucks
    Search
  23. See United States v. Gates
    Search
  24. See United States v. Orman
    Search
  25. of United States v. Costello
    Search
  26. Rex Trailer Co. v. United
    Search
  27. United States v. Costello
    Search
  28. United States v. Orman
    Search
  29. See Penfield Co. v. SEC
    Search
  30. Cf. Offutt v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial