Citation network
Moore Vs. Michigan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 09, 1957
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 155 (1957) U.S. Supreme Court Moore v. MichiganSearch
-
U.S. 155 (1957) Moore v. MichiganSearch
-
element of a fair hearing. The petitioner was 17 years of age, and had a seventh-grade education. Cf. DeMeerleer v. MichiganSearch
-
Williams v. HuffSearch
-
Cf. Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
evidence pointing to him as the perpetrator of the crime was entirely circumstantial. Cf. Pennsylvania ex rel. Herman v. ClaudySearch
-
the sentence. The right to counsel is not a right confined to representation during the trial on the merits. Reece v. GeorgiaSearch
-
The constitutional right, of course, does not justify forcing counsel upon an accused who wants none. See Carter v. IllinoisSearch
-
an element of Due Process under the Fourteenth Amendment, a finding of waiver is not lightly to be made. Cf. Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
Glasser v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 708 , 332 U. S. 723 . This Court held in Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
of proving nonwaiver as is required of a defendant in a federal case. We therefore hold that the rule of Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
of showing that the disavowal was not intelligently and understandingly made, and hence was not a waiver. Williams v. HuffSearch
-
is Page 355 U. S. 165 fortified by the inferences which may be drawn from the age of petitioner, Williams v. HuffSearch
-
U.S.App.D.C. 326, 146 F.2d 867, and the evidence of emotional disturbance, Hallowell v. UnitedSearch
-
See Quicksall v. MichiganSearch
-
People v. MooreSearch
-
Mich. 137, 73 N.W.2d 274. The majority opinion relied upon Quicksall v. MichiganSearch
-
the dissenting opinion upon DeMeerleer v. MichiganSearch
-
Canizio v. NewSearch
-
Gayes v. NewSearch
-
Palmer v. AsheSearch
-
waive his right to counsel. But for that issue, this case should be summarily affirmed on the authority of Quicksall v. MichiganSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Moore v. MichiganSearch
-
Cf. DeMeerleer v. MichiganSearch
-
Herman v. ClaudySearch
-
Reece v. GeorgiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial