Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Rathbun Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 09, 1957

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 37 unlinked
Show
  1. Rathbun v. United
    Search
  2. States - 355 U.S. 107 (1957) U.S. Supreme Court Rathbun v. United
    Search
  3. States, 355 U.S. 107 (1957) Rathbun v. United
    Search
  4. was convicted, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. 236 F.2d 514. We granted certiorari. 352 U.S. 965. Benanti v. United
    Search
  5. the light of reason and common understanding to reach the results intended by the legislature. Cf. Holy Trinity Church v. United
    Search
  6. American Security & Trust Co. v. Commissioners
    Search
  7. the police officers did divulge the contents of the overheard conversation when they testified in court. Cf. Benanti v. United
    Search
  8. United States v. Polakoff
    Search
  9. James v. United
    Search
  10. United States v. Hill
    Search
  11. Reitmeister v. Reitmeister
    Search
  12. United States v. White
    Search
  13. Flanders v. United
    Search
  14. United States v. Lewis
    Search
  15. F.Supp. 970, reversed on other grounds, Billeci v. United
    Search
  16. Rayson v. United
    Search
  17. United States v. Bookie
    Search
  18. United States v. Pierce
    Search
  19. See United States v. Polakoff
    Search
  20. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, whom MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS joins, dissenting. Although this Court had, in Olmstead v. United
    Search
  21. and likewise bar independently secured evidence obtained as a result of leads afforded by such interception. Nardone v. United
    Search
  22. Mr, Justice Sutherland, dissenting in Nardone v. United
    Search
  23. But the Court refused to qualify the rigorous policy of Congress as expressed by its enactment. And today, in Benanti v. Page
    Search
  24. of what theretofore was a lawful practice. Sharing the views expressed by Judge Learned Hand in United States v. Polakoff
    Search
  25. F.2d 888, and Reitmeister v. Reitmeister
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Rathbun v. United
    Search
  27. Benanti v. United
    Search
  28. Cf. Holy Trinity Church v. United
    Search
  29. Cf. Benanti v. United
    Search
  30. Reitmeister v. Reitmeister
    Search
  31. Billeci v. United
    Search
  32. Rayson v. United
    Search
  33. Olmstead v. United
    Search
  34. Nardone v. United
    Search
  35. Benanti v. Page
    Search
  36. and Reitmeister v. Reitmeister
    Search
  37. United States v. Sullivan
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial