Citation network
Rea Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 16, 1956
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Rea v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 350 U.S. 214 (1956) U.S. Supreme Court Rea v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 350 U.S. 214 (1956) Rea v. UnitedSearch
-
the Fourth Amendment, as judicially construed, would bar the use of this evidence in a federal prosecution, Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 232 U. S. 383 , our decision in Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
to suppress the use of the evidence in the state criminal proceedings would run counter to our decision in Stefanelli v. MinardSearch
-
to enjoin state officials, nor in any way to interfere with state agencies in enforcement of state law. Cf. Boske v. ComingoreSearch
-
a constitutional question, but one concerning our supervisory powers over federal law enforcement agencies. Cf. McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
the federal courts extends to policing those requirements and making certain that they are observed. As stated in Wise v. HenkelSearch
-
with the executive branch of the Government responsibility for supervising law enforcement activities as such. McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
Moreover, the Court has heretofore refused to extend the McNabb rule to state criminal trials. Stein v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
should not be exercised. On that basis, I think the decision cannot be reconciled with the rationale of Stefanelli v. MinardSearch
-
the Fourteenth Amendment, evidence unlawfully seized by a State can nevertheless be used in state prosecutions. Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
is, for me, not a sufficient answer, since the only difference I can see between the Wolf decision and Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
to suppress the evidence with this Court sitting in review if the State improperly refuses to do so. Cf. Douglas v. JeannetteSearch
-
taken the view that the States should be left free to follow or not the federal exclusionary rule set forth in Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Rea v. UnitedSearch
-
Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Boske v. ComingoreSearch
-
Cf. McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
Stein v. NewSearch
-
of Stefanelli v. MinardSearch
-
and Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Douglas v. JeannetteSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial