Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Communist Party Vs. Sacb

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 30, 1956

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 1 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Peters Vs. Hobby US Supreme Court · Jun 06, 1955
  2. U.S. 115 (1956) U.S. Supreme Court Communist Party v. SACB
    Search
  3. U.S. 115 (1956) Communist Party v. Subserve
    Search
  4. for the District of Columbia -- one case is reported at 96 F.Supp. 47 ( Communist Party of United States of America v. McGrath
    Search
  5. be decided on a nonconstitutional issue, if the record calls for it, without reaching constitutional problems. Peters v. Hobby
    Search
  6. boasts. This Court is charged with supervisory functions in relation to proceedings in the federal courts. See McNabb v. United
    Search
  7. motion charged that Crouch and Johnson had perjured themselves in their testimony in such other cases as United States v. Kuzma
    Search
  8. United States v. Bridges
    Search
  9. In re Burck, and United States v. Weinberg
    Search
  10. of cross-examination before the Board, the Party charged that witness Johnson had committed perjury in Pennsylvania v. Nelson
    Search
  11. Dmytryshyn, United States v. Eisler
    Search
  12. the history of the Court where important constitutional issues have been avoided on such a pretext. Certainly Peters v. Hobby
    Search
  13. notice of the two cases where Matusow submitted affidavits stating that he had lied during the trial, United States v. Jencks
    Search
  14. and United States v. Flynn
    Search
  15. true. The motion based entirely on Matusow's recantation was denied. This was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, Jencks v. United
    Search
  16. proceedings despite the retraction by Matusow of specific sworn testimony given at the trials. See also United States v. Parker
    Search
  17. Labor Board v. Indiana
    Search
  18. we declined to review state criminal convictions in which must stronger allegations of perjury were made. See Reynolds v. Texas
    Search
  19. Whitener v. South
    Search
  20. Carolina, 350 U.S. 861, and Coco v. Florida
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court Communist Party v. SACB
    Search
  22. Communist Party v. Subserve
    Search
  23. Communist Party of United States of America v. McGrath
    Search
  24. See McNabb v. United
    Search
  25. United States v. Kuzma
    Search
  26. Burck, and United States v. Weinberg
    Search
  27. Pennsylvania v. Nelson
    Search
  28. Dmytryshyn, United States v. Eisler
    Search
  29. Certainly Peters v. Hobby
    Search
  30. United States v. Jencks
    Search
  31. the Court of Appeals, Jencks v. United
    Search
  32. United States v. Parker
    Search
  33. See Reynolds v. Texas
    Search
  34. and Coco v. Florida
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales