Citation network
United States Vs. Zucca
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 30, 1956
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 91 (1956) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ZuccaSearch
-
U.S. 91 (1956) United States v. ZuccaSearch
-
a) is the only section under which a United States Attorney may institute denaturalization proceedings. Bindczyck v. FinucaneSearch
-
legislative history. On the contrary, we think that it is entirely consistent with the Court's statement in Bindczyck v. FinucaneSearch
-
construction of a statute by the officer charged with its enforcement is entitled to great weight. Fawcus Machine Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
relies particularly on our affirmance of the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Schwinn v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. TuteurSearch
-
Schwinn v. UnitedSearch
-
and District of Columbia Circuits had taken the position adopted by the Second Circuit in this case. United States v. RichmondSearch
-
United States v. SalomonSearch
-
Cohen v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 38 App.D.C. 123. The Seventh and Ninth Circuits favored the contrary position. United States v. TuteurSearch
-
United States v. LelesSearch
-
without suggesting that it was not an essential procedural step in the denaturalization proceeding. See Johannessen v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief for the United States, United States v. MinkerSearch
-
United States v. RichmondSearch
-
by virtue of his oath to carry out his official duties fairly and impartially. No more was present in Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 351 U. S. 104 There is no comparable requirement for an indictment in a criminal prosecution, Costello v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. CollinsSearch
-
United States v. ShinkevichSearch
-
United States v. JeromeSearch
-
United States v. LustigSearch
-
United States v. SchuchhardtSearch
-
United States v. RadzieSearch
-
United States v. VavoritoSearch
-
In Schwinn v. UnitedSearch
-
that the certificate had been illegally procured. 311 U.S. 616. In Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ZuccaSearch
-
Bindczyck v. FinucaneSearch
-
Fawcus Machine Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
See Johannessen v. UnitedSearch
-
the United States, United States v. MinkerSearch
-
Costello v. UnitedSearch
-
In Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. KnightSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial