Citation network
General Box Co. Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 07, 1956
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
General Box Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 351 U.S. 159 (1956) U.S. Supreme Court General Box Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 351 U.S. 159 (1956) General Box Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
We ordinarily accept the determinations of the Courts of Appeals on questions of local law, and we do so here. Ragan v. MerchantsSearch
-
The Louisiana courts have made no pronouncement which directly controls this question. But see Board of Comm'rs v. TrouilleSearch
-
Court of Louisiana has, however, as recently as 1946, reviewed the long history of the riparian servitude. Dickson v. BoardSearch
-
Board of Comm'rs v. FranklinSearch
-
Italics omitted). Boyce Cottonseed Oil Mfg. Co. v. BoardSearch
-
See Wolfe v. HurleySearch
-
Dickson v. BoardSearch
-
Pruyn v. NelsonSearch
-
Mayer v. BoardSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Peart v. MeekerSearch
-
Cf. Lacour v. RedSearch
-
improvement of the levee. It is sufficient if the trees were destroyed in connection with a levee project. Cf. Lacour v. RedSearch
-
Petitioner relies on language in Peart v. MeekerSearch
-
La.Ann. 421, 426, 12 So. 490, 492, and in Pruyn v. NelsonSearch
-
Cf. Eldridge v. TrezevantSearch
-
Wolfe v. HurleySearch
-
La. 859, 54 So.2d 125, appeal dismissed, 342 U.S. 844, on authority of Eldridge v. TrezevantSearch
-
supra, and Wolfe v. HurleySearch
-
procedure is not without resources for enabling us to found our decision securely on state law. See, e.g., Propper v. ClarkSearch
-
Constitution, which provides that batture may be taken for levee purposes without compensation. See General Box Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
this one, we have deferred to decisions of the lower federal judge on the local law of his own State. See MacGregor v. StateSearch
-
Huddleston v. PageSearch
-
Hillsborough v. CromwellSearch
-
Steele v. GeneralSearch
-
Ragan v. MerchantsSearch
-
Bernhardt v. PolygraphicSearch
-
Co., 350 U. S. 198 , 350 U. S. 204 . Judge Dawkins relied on Pruyn v. NelsonSearch
-
a case from Puerto Rico, of the special deference due local judges on rulings upon matters under the civil law. Diaz v. GonzalezSearch
-
Private property must give way before it -- but only to extent that the public welfare demands. As stated in Peart v. MeekerSearch
-
delay to the United States. The requirement of notice is deeply engrained in our system of jurisprudence. Mullane v. CentralSearch
-
Covey v. TownSearch
-
which notice was not given in time to allow property to be salvaged from the batture. In Board of Levee Commissioners v. KellySearch
-
days' notice was given to batture dwellers to remove their structures and possessions. And see Board of Commissioners v. FranklinSearch
-
Board of Commissioners v. TrouilleSearch
-
The Court quotes from Dickson v. BoardSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court General Box Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Board of Comm'rs v. TrouilleSearch
-
Boyce Cottonseed Oil Mfg. Co. v. BoardSearch
-
of Eldridge v. TrezevantSearch
-
and Wolfe v. HurleySearch
-
Propper v. ClarkSearch
-
See General Box Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
State. See MacGregor v. StateSearch
-
Mullane v. CentralSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial