Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Auto Workers Vs. WisconsIn Board

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 04, 1956

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Auto Workers v. Wisconsin
    Search
  2. Board - 351 U.S. 266 (1956) U.S. Supreme Court Auto Workers v. Wisconsin
    Search
  3. Board, 351 U.S. 266 (1956) United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Wisconsin
    Search
  4. of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, cover the labor relations of the Kohler Company. Labor Board v. Jones
    Search
  5. its control by the Supremacy Clause, art. 6, cl. 2, supersedes or, in the current phrase, preempts state power. Kelly v. Washington
    Search
  6. Wisconsin, under its same Labor Peace Act, could enjoin union conduct of the kind here involved. Allen-Bradley Local v. Wisconsin
    Search
  7. But this cannot be correct, since Allen-Bradley Local v. Wisconsin
    Search
  8. involving federal-state jurisdiction over industrial controversies. They have been adequately summarized in Weber v. Anheuser-Busch
    Search
  9. Federal v. State
    Search
  10. See Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor
    Search
  11. Board, 313 U. S. 177 , 313 U. S. 182 , First. Cf. Labor Board v. Hearst
    Search
  12. United Construction Workers v. Laburnum
    Search
  13. See Weber v. Anheuser-Busch
    Search
  14. Garner v. Teamsters
    Search
  15. International Union v. O'Brien
    Search
  16. International Union v. Wisconsin
    Search
  17. Cf. Hughes v. Superior
    Search
  18. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Hanke
    Search
  19. where we have sustained identical regulations of the same act by both a State and the Federal Government. California v. Zook
    Search
  20. Government regulate the same act, but each with a different sanction, both often survive. United Construction Workers v. Laburnum
    Search
  21. prescribed by Congress. Each reaches the same identical conduct. We disallowed that duplication of remedy in Garner v. Teamsters
    Search
  22. court could not enjoin action which was subject to an unfair labor proceeding under the federal Act. And see Weber v. Anheuser-Busch
    Search
  23. Allen-Bradley Local v. Wisconsin
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Auto Workers v. Wisconsin
    Search
  25. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Wisconsin
    Search
  26. of the Kohler Company. Labor Board v. Jones
    Search
  27. Kelly v. Washington
    Search
  28. Weber v. Anheuser-Busch
    Search
  29. First. Cf. Labor Board v. Hearst
    Search
  30. State and the Federal Government. California v. Zook
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial