Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Desylva Vs. Ballentine

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 11, 1956

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 2 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Heiser Vs. Woodruff US Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1946
  2. Mazer Vs. Stein US Supreme Court · Mar 08, 1954
  3. U.S. 570 (1956) U.S. Supreme Court DeSylva v. Ballentine
    Search
  4. U.S. 570 (1956) DeSylva v. Ballentine
    Search
  5. Page 351 U. S. 578 of an ambiguous statute by the agency charged with its administration, cf. Mazer v. Stein
    Search
  6. difficulties, or which are so extraordinary that clear, unambiguous wording is required. Cf. United States v. Minker
    Search
  7. not mean that its content is not to be determined by state, rather than federal, law. Cf. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Beaver
    Search
  8. Board of County Commissioners v. United
    Search
  9. we deem state law controlling. Cf. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Kenney
    Search
  10. Petitioner relies on McCool v. Smith
    Search
  11. only the interpretation of a state statute, and we do not consider it controlling here. Cf. Hutchinson Investment Co. v. Caldwell
    Search
  12. could, of course, give the word the meaning it has under the laws of the several States. See Hutchinson Investment Co. v. Caldwell
    Search
  13. Poff v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  14. diversity which would flow from incorporating into the Act the laws of forty-eight States. Cf. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United
    Search
  15. National Metropolitan Bank v. United
    Search
  16. United States v. Standard
    Search
  17. U. S. 307 . An illegitimate child was given the benefits of the Federal Death Act by Middleton v. Luckenbach
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court DeSylva v. Ballentine
    Search
  19. Cf. United States v. Minker
    Search
  20. Cf. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Beaver
    Search
  21. Cf. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Kenney
    Search
  22. McCool v. Smith
    Search
  23. Cf. Hutchinson Investment Co. v. Caldwell
    Search
  24. States. See Hutchinson Investment Co. v. Caldwell
    Search
  25. States. Cf. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United
    Search
  26. Middleton v. Luckenbach
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales