Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Czaplicki Vs. the Hoegh Silvercloud

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 11, 1956

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 5 linked 23 unlinked
Show
  1. American Stevedores, Inc. Vs. Porello US Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1947
  2. Southern Pacific Co. Vs. Bogert US Supreme Court · Jun 09, 1919
  3. Aetna Life Ins. Co. Vs. Moses US Supreme Court · Jan 09, 1933
  4. Holmberg Vs. Armbrecht US Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1946
  5. Doleman Vs. Levine US Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1935
  6. Czaplicki v. The
    Search
  7. Hoegh Silvercloud - 351 U.S. 525 (1956) U.S. Supreme Court Czaplicki v. The
    Search
  8. Hoegh Silvercloud, 351 U.S. 525 (1956) Czaplicki v. The
    Search
  9. a claim over by Kerr or the Norwegian Trade Mission if either of them should be held liable. Cf. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic
    Search
  10. action, the statute places the assignee in the position of a fiduciary, cf. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United
    Search
  11. himself. In so holding, we recognize that one Court of Appeals has held otherwise under this same statute, see Hunt v. Bank
    Search
  12. Line, 35 F.2d 136, as have certain state courts under similar statutes, see Taylor v. New
    Search
  13. Whalen v. Athol
    Search
  14. lapse of time, the question is whether it would be inequitable, because of the delay, to enforce the claim. Holmberg v. Armbrecht
    Search
  15. Gardner v. Panama
    Search
  16. subrogated to the rights of the insured can sue in his own name. See, e.g., Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix
    Search
  17. S. 634 . Travelers was, therefore, the proper party libelant had it chosen to sue in this case. Cf. United States v. Aetna
    Search
  18. Cas. & Surety Co., 338 U. S. 366 , 338 U. S. 380 -381. Doleman v. Levine
    Search
  19. Cf. Ettlinger v. Persian
    Search
  20. et seq. -- on the basis of the analysis made in United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court Czaplicki v. The
    Search
  22. Cf. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic
    Search
  23. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United
    Search
  24. Hunt v. Bank
    Search
  25. Taylor v. New
    Search
  26. Whalen v. Athol
    Search
  27. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix
    Search
  28. Cf. United States v. Aetna
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales