Citation network
Parr Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 11, 1956
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Parr v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 351 U.S. 513 (1956) U.S. Supreme Court Parr v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 351 U.S. 513 (1956) Parr v. UnitedSearch
-
Christi proceeding as a separate prosecution, petitioner has not been injured by its termination in his favor. Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
the dismissal order must abide petitioner's trial, and only then, if convicted, will he have been aggrieved. Cf. Heike v. UnitedSearch
-
in federal appellate procedure require no elaboration at this late date. See Cobbledick v. UnitedSearch
-
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern R. Co. v. SouthernSearch
-
Co., 108 U. S. 24 , 108 U. S. 28 . This rule applies in criminal as well as civil cases. Berman v. UnitedSearch
-
Berman v. UnitedSearch
-
Heike v. UnitedSearch
-
recognized by this Court in such cases as Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U. S. 541 , and Swift & Company v. CompaniaSearch
-
Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Swift & Company v. CompaniaSearch
-
Cobbledick v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
cases cited therein. This is not a case where a court has exceeded or refused to exercise its jurisdiction, see Roche v. EvaporatedSearch
-
U. S. 26 , nor one where appellate review will be defeated if a writ does not issue, cf. Maryland v. SoperSearch
-
they may not be used Page 351 U. S. 521 to thwart the congressional policy against piecemeal appeals. Roche v. EvaporatedSearch
-
Together with No. 202, Misc., Parr v. RiceSearch
-
established prior to the nonsuit, and was obviously aggrieved by the loss of that judgment. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v. ManningSearch
-
Massachusetts Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. SchmickSearch
-
Iowa-Nebraska L. & P. Co. v. DanielsSearch
-
F.2d 322. In the fourth case, Cybur Lumber Co. v. ErkhartSearch
-
had the requisite finality, petitioner may not appeal it, because he was not aggrieved thereby, relying upon Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Parr v. UnitedSearch
-
Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Heike v. UnitedSearch
-
See Cobbledick v. UnitedSearch
-
and Swift & Company v. CompaniaSearch
-
Roche v. EvaporatedSearch
-
Misc., Parr v. RiceSearch
-
Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v. ManningSearch
-
Cybur Lumber Co. v. ErkhartSearch
-
Maryland v. SoperSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial