Citation network
Sears, Roebuck and Co. Vs. Mackey
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 11, 1956
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MackeySearch
-
U.S. 427 (1956) U.S. Supreme Court Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MackeySearch
-
U.S. 427 (1956) Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MackeySearch
-
by court decisions. The validity of that rule is no longer questioned. In fact, it was applied by this Court in Reeves v. BeardallSearch
-
directly or impliedly sustaining the validity of amended Rule 54(b) as applied in the instant case, see Rieser v. BaltimoreSearch
-
United Artists Corp. v. MasterpieceSearch
-
Clarksville v. UnitedSearch
-
Boston Medical Supply Co. v. LeaSearch
-
Bendix Aviation Corp. v. GlassSearch
-
Lopinsky v. HertzSearch
-
Pabellon v. GraceSearch
-
Rieser v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Flegenheimer v. GeneralSearch
-
Mills, Inc., 191 F.2d 237. See also Gold Seal Co. v. WeeksSearch
-
Sears also contends that the Court of Appeals misconstrued amended Rule 54(b). See Flegenheimer v. GeneralSearch
-
lie to review a judgment that failed to adjudicate every cause of action asserted in the controversy. See Holcombe v. McKusickSearch
-
a judgment was not appealable if it disposed of some, but less than all, of the claims presented. See Collins v. MillerSearch
-
Sheppy v. StevensSearch
-
was joint, a judgment was not appealable unless it terminated the action as to all the defendants. See Hohorst v. Hamburg-AmericanSearch
-
separate and distinct from the others, that judgment, under some circumstances, was appealable. See Republic of China v. AmericanSearch
-
Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
it has been held repeatedly that only Congress may define the jurisdiction of the lower federal courts. See Sibbach v. WilsonSearch
-
See Pabellon v. GraceSearch
-
For favorable comment on this aspect of the rule, see Dickinson v. PetroleumSearch
-
See Collins v. Metro-GoldwynSearch
-
Pictures Corp., 106 F.2d 83, cited in Reeves v. BeardallSearch
-
See Cobbledick v. UnitedSearch
-
said has not a little kinship with the pronouncements of the Delphic oracle. The opinion in Cold Metal Process Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
a wisely sanctioned, principle against piecemeal appeals governing litigation in the federal courts. See Cobbledick v. UnitedSearch
-
Radio Station WOW v. JohnsonSearch
-
that the whole of a litigation, no matter what its nature, must be completed before any appeal is allowed, see Collins v. MillerSearch
-
when failure to do so would preclude any effective review or would result in irreparable injury. See Forgay v. ConradSearch
-
Swift & Co. v. CompaniaSearch
-
in the rest of the proceedings, and to make him await their outcome would merely cause unfairness. See Williams v. MorganSearch
-
United States v. RiverSearch
-
on a set of facts separate and independent from the facts on which the remainder of the litigation was based. Reeves v. BeardallSearch
-
on that phase of the litigation. This provision was directed to the kind of difficulty encountered in Dickinson v. PetroleumSearch
-
of the certified parts of the litigation in the two cases now before the Court. Count II in Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. MackeySearch
-
as an interlocutory order denying an injunction. In Cold Metal Process Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MackeySearch
-
Rieser v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Gold Seal Co. v. WeeksSearch
-
See Flegenheimer v. GeneralSearch
-
See Holcombe v. McKusickSearch
-
See Collins v. MillerSearch
-
See Hohorst v. Hamburg-AmericanSearch
-
See Republic of China v. AmericanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial