Citation network
Granville-smith Vs. Granville-smith
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 11, 1955
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 1 (1955) U.S. Supreme Court Granville-Smith v. Granville-SmithSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1955) Granville-Smith v. Granville-SmithSearch
-
Since no further evidence was proffered, the court, relying on its earlier opinion in Alton v. AltonSearch
-
territory. See, e.g., Rassmussen v. UnitedSearch
-
of as future States. To these only some essentials, withal undefined, of the Constitution extended. See, e.g., Balzac v. PortoSearch
-
a) the right of the individual to trial by jury and similar protections, e.g., Balzac v. PortoSearch
-
b) the right of the Federal Government to tax territorial products on a nonuniform basis, e.g., Downes v. BidwellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
those in which the sovereign immunity of the territory was in issue, e.g., Porto Rico v. RosalySearch
-
those in which conflict was claimed with the United States Constitution or laws, e.g., Puerto Rico v. ShellSearch
-
Territory of Montana v. LeeSearch
-
nature of particular territorial legislation was assailed, e.g., Tiaco v. ForbesSearch
-
People v. DanielsSearch
-
whether a territorial legislature has transcended the familiar bounds of legislation. See, e.g., Christianson v. KingSearch
-
the right to pass laws applicable not generally, but to specific individuals or portions of a territory. In Maynard v. HillSearch
-
Burch v. BurchSearch
-
in 1954. Act of July 22, 1954, 68 Stat. 497. Previous to the legislation, this Court, on June 1, had dismissed Alton v. AltonSearch
-
Terrill v. PageSearch
-
Wilson v. WilsonSearch
-
growing out of the needs of the Islands and governing relations within them. An example is provided by Puerto Rico v. ShellSearch
-
The Virgin Islanders could, of course, bring themselves within the 1944 law as interpreted in Burch v. BurchSearch
-
with the forum. Virgin Islanders seeking divorce are not sojourners, mere transients in the Islands. Cf. Berger v. BergerSearch
-
hundred and forty-three were granted (14.3 per 1,000) as opposed to only 237 marriages. But the decisions in Alton v. AltonSearch
-
Beginning with Downes v. BidwellSearch
-
In Balzac v. PortoSearch
-
Cincinnati Soap Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Ibid. Each Colonial Council subsequently passed a divorce law, verbally drawn from that of Alaska. Burch v. BurchSearch
-
Cf. People v. DanielsSearch
-
the Legislative Assembly addressed themselves to the reasons for changing the result of the Court of Appeals in Burch v. BurchSearch
-
as one reason for the tourist slump during the previous season. District Judge Moore, who decided both Alton v. AltonSearch
-
Jackson, The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy (1941), p. 81. Some 10 years later, in Harisiades v. ShaughnessySearch
-
We note that the majority cites People v. DanielsSearch
-
In Cope v. CopeSearch
-
standards of legislative jurisdiction under the Due Process Clause, Page 349 U. S. 22 see Miller Bros. Co. v. MarylandSearch
-
They are domiciled in the Islands, and could, of course, bring themselves within the 1944 law as interpreted in Burch v. BurchSearch
-
from passing such enactments, that is another story. But it has not done so. The language of Mr. Justice Brown in Cope v. CopeSearch
-
provision of the 1936 Act. Cf. Alaska Steamship Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
is interesting to note the explanation Page 349 U. S. 26 of Government counsel on this point in Porto Rico v. RosalySearch
-
no other State can question the validity of the divorce so long as both parties appeared in the action. See Johnson v. MuelbergerSearch
-
subject, of course, to the power of the Congress. This view is supported by the Government's argument in Puerto Rico v. ShellSearch
-
Walker v. NewSearch
-
Hornbuckle v. TombsSearch
-
Gromer v. StandardSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial