Citation network
Fpc Vs. Oregon
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 06, 1955
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 435 (1955) U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. OregonSearch
-
U.S. 435 (1955) Federal Power Commission v. OregonSearch
-
U. S. 437 MR. JUSTICE BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court. As in First Iowa Hydro-Electric Coop. v. FederalSearch
-
in the instant case Page 349 U. S. 446 agrees. 211 F.2d at 351. And see Washington Department of Game v. FederalSearch
-
of the Federal Power Commission unless that jurisdiction is modified by other federal legislation. See United States v. RioSearch
-
Gutierres v. AlbuquerqueSearch
-
Page 349 U. S. 448 of possessory rights on public lands asserted under local laws and customs. Jennison v. KirkSearch
-
such water rights were to be acquired in the manner provided by the law of the location. California-Oregon Power Co. v. BeaverSearch
-
Portland Cement Co., 295 U. S. 142 . See also Nebraska v. WyomingSearch
-
U. S. 501 , 303 U. S. 510 . See also United States v. MinnesotaSearch
-
Stat. 963, 964. Oregon has recognized that it is bound by this Treaty. Anthony v. VeatchSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Or. 462, 483-485, 220 P.2d 493, 502-503, 221 P.2d 575. See also United States v. WinansSearch
-
as is here proposed, when the waters involved are navigable waters of the United States. Washington Department of Game v. FederalSearch
-
See United States v. UtahSearch
-
See Hynes v. GrimesSearch
-
Minnesota v. UnitedSearch
-
First Iowa Hydro Electric Co-op. v. FederalSearch
-
The argument pressed on us by the United States is akin to the one urged in Nebraska v. WyomingSearch
-
other decisions of this Court, both construing the Desert Land Act. The first of these is California-Oregon Power Co. v. BeaverSearch
-
In Ickes v. FoxSearch
-
Columbia. If so, this dam could find constitutional sanction under the Commerce Clause. See Oklahoma ex rel. Phillips v. GuySearch
-
Oregon could demand compensation for the loss of any water power rights it possessed. See Federal Power Commission v. NiagaraSearch
-
the authority of the United States in the water power would be complete without reference to state law. United States v. Chandler-DunbarSearch
-
United States v. CommodoreSearch
-
to proceed, irrespective of the approval of the State where the dam is located. First Iowa Hydro Electric Co-op. v. FederalSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. OregonSearch
-
Federal Power Commission v. OregonSearch
-
First Iowa Hydro-Electric Coop. v. FederalSearch
-
Washington Department of Game v. FederalSearch
-
See United States v. RioSearch
-
California-Oregon Power Co. v. BeaverSearch
-
United States v. MinnesotaSearch
-
Treaty. Anthony v. VeatchSearch
-
of the United States. Washington Department of Game v. FederalSearch
-
Phillips v. GuySearch
-
See Federal Power Commission v. NiagaraSearch
-
United States v. Chandler-DunbarSearch
-
Nebraska v. WyomingSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial