Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Carroll Vs. Lanza

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 06, 1955

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

63 entries 11 linked 52 unlinked
Show
  1. Broderick Vs. Rosner US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1935
  2. Hughes Vs. Fetter US Supreme Court · Jun 04, 1951
  3. Olmsted Vs. Olmsted US Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1910
    Relied / Followed
  4. Converse Vs. Hamilton US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1912
  5. Hood Vs. Mcgehee US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1915
  6. Modern Woodmen of America Vs. Mixer US Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1925
  7. Chandler Vs. Peketz US Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1936
  8. Magnolia Petroleum Co. Vs. Hunt US Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1943
  9. Hancock National Bank Vs. Farnum US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1900
  10. Bond Vs. Hume US Supreme Court · Mar 06, 1917
    Relied / Followed
  11. U.S. 408 (1955) U.S. Supreme Court Carroll v. Lanza
    Search
  12. U.S. 408 (1955) Carroll v. Lanza
    Search
  13. to the Missouri law, and the judgment is sustained. Pp. 349 U. S. 409 -414. (a) Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt
    Search
  14. is marked as the exclusive one by the state where the contract of employment was made. Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. Commission
    Search
  15. U. S. 493 . Pp. 349 U. S. 412 -413. (d) Hughes v. Fetter
    Search
  16. such as Lanza, the respondent, was a third party within the meaning of the Arkansas Act. And see Baldwin Co. v. Maner
    Search
  17. U.S. 870, because of doubts as to the correctness of the decision raised by Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. Industrial
    Search
  18. Accident Commission, 306 U. S. 493 . The Court of Appeals thought Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt
    Search
  19. within the meaning of the Full Faith and Credit Clause. See Bradford Electric Light Co. v. Clapper
    Search
  20. Alaska Packers Assn, v. Industrial
    Search
  21. U.S. at 286 U. S. 159 . Page 349 U. S. 412 Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. Industrial
    Search
  22. Page 349 U. S. 413 refusing to make relief by way of workmen's compensation the exclusive remedy. Baldwin Co. v. Maner
    Search
  23. injury. The problems of medical care and of possible dependents are among these, as Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. Industrial
    Search
  24. U. S. 501 . A State that legislates concerning them is exercising traditional powers of sovereignty. Cf. Watson v. Employers
    Search
  25. this case, Carroll's injury may have cast no burden on her or on her institutions. This is not a case, like Hughes v. Fetter
    Search
  26. occurring in Illinois, since we found no sufficient policy considerations to warrant such refusal. And see Broderick v. Rosner
    Search
  27. even when, as here, the employee of the subcontractor sues the general contractor for common law damages. Bunner v. Patti
    Search
  28. which the forum was called upon to give effect to a sister state statute and declined to do so. Hancock National Bank v. Farnum
    Search
  29. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R. Co. v. Sowers
    Search
  30. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. v. George
    Search
  31. First National Bank of Chicago v. United
    Search
  32. Wells v. Simonds
    Search
  33. to enforce a sister state statute giving a transitory cause of action, whether in contract or tort. E.g., Broderick v. Rosner
    Search
  34. an out-of-state statute which would have prevented the forum from enforcing the right. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. v. George
    Search
  35. forum may, however, apply its own more restrictive statute of limitations to an outside wrongful death action, Wells v. Simonds
    Search
  36. s public policy, or a law which requires specialized proceedings or remedies not available in the forum, see Broderick v. Rosner
    Search
  37. exclusiveness, or in which the forum applied the sister state statute because the forum's was not exclusive. Bond v. Hume
    Search
  38. Ohio v. Chattanooga
    Search
  39. Industrial Commission v. McCartin
    Search
  40. U. S. 622 . See also Bonaparte v. Tax
    Search
  41. American Fire Insurance Co. v. King
    Search
  42. is required before exclusiveness will be attributed. See Industrial Commission v. McCartin
    Search
  43. or judicial, when clearly in conflict with the out-of-state statute. National Mutual Building & Loan Association v. Brahan
    Search
  44. New York Life Insurance Co. v. Head
    Search
  45. Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. Green
    Search
  46. Marin v. Augedahl
    Search
  47. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Dunken
    Search
  48. Bradford Electric Light Co. v. Clapper
    Search
  49. Alaska Packers Association v. Industrial
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial