Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Reece Vs. Georgia

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 05, 1955

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 3 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Norris Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1935
  2. Carter Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1900
  3. United States Vs. Gale US Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1883
  4. U.S. 85 (1955) U.S. Supreme Court Reece v. Georgia
    Search
  5. U.S. 85 (1955) Reece v. Georgia
    Search
  6. to consider all of the substantial federal questions determined in the earlier stages of the litigation, Urie v. Thompson
    Search
  7. questions is not affected by a ruling that the first decision of the state court became the law of the case, Davis v. O'Hara
    Search
  8. members of his race have been systematically excluded is a denial of his right to equal protection of the laws. Patton v. Mississippi
    Search
  9. Rogers v. Alabama
    Search
  10. a defendant, his right may be asserted by a plea in abatement or a motion to quash before arraignment, United States v. Gale
    Search
  11. U. S. 72 . Of course, if such a motion is controverted, it must be supported by evidence, Patton v. Mississippi
    Search
  12. Martin v. Texas
    Search
  13. Smith v. Texas
    Search
  14. U. S. 128 , 311 U. S. 132 . This evidence placed the burden on the State to refute it, Patton v. Mississippi
    Search
  15. and mere assertions of public officials that there has not been discrimination will not suffice. See Hernandez v. Texas
    Search
  16. Reece v. State
    Search
  17. Ga. 578, 82 S.E.2d 10. This rule goes back to 1882, Williams v. State
    Search
  18. Ga. 11, and has been consistently followed in that State. A similar requirement was considered by this Court in Carter v. Texas
    Search
  19. in Carter, the right to object to a grand jury presupposes an opportunity to exercise that right. United States v. Gale
    Search
  20. U. S. 65 , 109 U. S. 72 . Michel v. Louisiana
    Search
  21. when counsel was not provided for him Page 350 U. S. 90 until the day after he was indicted. In Powell v. Alabama
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Reece v. Georgia
    Search
  23. Urie v. Thompson
    Search
  24. Davis v. O'Hara
    Search
  25. Patton v. Mississippi
    Search
  26. See Hernandez v. Texas
    Search
  27. Williams v. State
    Search
  28. Michel v. Louisiana
    Search
  29. In Powell v. Alabama
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial