Citation network
National Union Vs. Arnold
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 22, 1954
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 37 (1954) U.S. Supreme Court National Union v. ArnoldSearch
-
U.S. 37 (1954) National Union of Marine Cooks & Stewards v. ArnoldSearch
-
case did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Pp. 348 U. S. 41 -45. (a) Hove v. ElliottSearch
-
case constituted such a means. The constitutional objection raised by petitioner was long ago considered in Hovey v. ElliottSearch
-
in court. The dismissal has cut off only a statutory right of review after a full trial by judge and jury. In Hovey v. ElliottSearch
-
and must be exercised without discrimination, such a review is not a requirement of due process. District of Columbia v. ClawansSearch
-
Ohio v. AkronSearch
-
has escaped from custody while his appeal is pending, this Court has upheld a dismissal of his appeal. Cf. Eisler v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
after a state prisoner's recapture, this Court has sustained a state court's refusal to revive his appeal. Allen v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U. S. 138 . See also Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
Washington v. HandySearch
-
People v. GenetSearch
-
Massachusetts v. AndrewsSearch
-
Arnold v. NationalSearch
-
of a litigant's right to present a defense has been upheld not as a punishment for contempt, as prohibited in Hovey v. ElliottSearch
-
violation of a rule of procedure, or other action justifying a judgment of default against him. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSearch
-
Peitzman v. CitySearch
-
of Illmo, 141 F.2d 956, 960-961. See also Bennett v. BennettSearch
-
Young & Holland Co. v. BrandeSearch
-
Lawson v. BlackSearch
-
Allen v. GeorgiaSearch
-
For a similar rule in custody cases, see Casebolt v. ButlerSearch
-
Lindsay v. LindsaySearch
-
Henderson v. HendersonSearch
-
of its decree and he absents himself from that jurisdiction, dismissal of his appeal has been upheld. Bronk v. BronkSearch
-
Fla. 474, 35 So. 870. MR. JUSTICE BLACK, with whom MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS concurs, dissenting. In Hovey v. ElliottSearch
-
a court order to turn over certain bonds which were not even the subject matter of this lawsuit. I think the Hovey v. ElliottSearch
-
which the Fourteenth Amendment requires. Cole v. ArkansasSearch
-
Amendment's equal protection Page 348 U. S. 46 command in deciding who can and who cannot appeal. Cochran v. KansasSearch
-
valid statutes is not unlimited. State punishments must not obliterate clearly granted federal rights. See, e.g., Hill v. FloridaSearch
-
The right of a person to be heard in his own defense stands on an equally firm constitutional base. In McVeigh v. UnitedSearch
-
other crime, and certainly the state court's power to do so is no greater than that of the state's legislature. Hovey v. ElliottSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court National Union v. ArnoldSearch
-
National Union of Marine Cooks & Stewards v. ArnoldSearch
-
Hove v. ElliottSearch
-
In Hovey v. ElliottSearch
-
Cf. Eisler v. UnitedSearch
-
Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
Casebolt v. ButlerSearch
-
Bronk v. BronkSearch
-
the Hovey v. ElliottSearch
-
Hill v. FloridaSearch
-
In McVeigh v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial