Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Berman Vs. Parker

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 22, 1954

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 2 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Ex Rel. Tva Vs. Welch US Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1946
  2. United States Vs. Carmack US Supreme Court · Dec 09, 1946
    Distinguished
  3. U.S. 26 (1954) U.S. Supreme Court Berman v. Parker
    Search
  4. U.S. 26 (1954) Berman v. Parker
    Search
  5. Columbia includes all the legislative powers which a state may exercise over its affairs. See District of Columbia v. Thompson
    Search
  6. to be served by social legislation, whether it be Congress legislating concerning the District of Columbia ( see Block v. Hirsh
    Search
  7. U. S. 135 ) or the States legislating concerning local affairs. See Olsen v. Nebraska
    Search
  8. Lincoln Union v. Northwestern
    Search
  9. California State Association v. Maloney
    Search
  10. whether that power is being exercised for a public purpose is an extremely narrow one. See Old Dominion Co. v. United
    Search
  11. to municipal affairs. Yet they merely illustrate the scope of the power, and do not delimit it. See Noble State Bank v. Haskell
    Search
  12. project is or is not desirable. The concept of the public welfare is broad and inclusive. See Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. Missouri
    Search
  13. the exercise of eminent domain is clear. For the power of eminent domain is merely the means to the end. See Luxton v. North
    Search
  14. United States v. Gettysburg
    Search
  15. project are for Congress, and Congress alone, to determine once the public purpose has been established. See Luxton v. North
    Search
  16. Highland v. Russell
    Search
  17. that the cycle of decay of the area could be controlled, and the birth of future slums prevented. Cf. Gohld Realty Co. v. Hartford
    Search
  18. Hunter v. Redevelopment
    Search
  19. U. S. 36 tract to complete the integrated plan rests in the discretion of the legislative branch. See Shoemaker v. United
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court Berman v. Parker
    Search
  21. See District of Columbia v. Thompson
    Search
  22. Block v. Hirsh
    Search
  23. See Olsen v. Nebraska
    Search
  24. See Old Dominion Co. v. United
    Search
  25. TVA v. Welch
    Search
  26. See Noble State Bank v. Haskell
    Search
  27. See Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. Missouri
    Search
  28. See Luxton v. North
    Search
  29. Highland v. Russell
    Search
  30. Cf. Gohld Realty Co. v. Hartford
    Search
  31. See Shoemaker v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial